![]() |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Just starting to make plans for a new tank and am planning on a custom 36X24X24 in a peninsula style config on a custom stand as well. Just going through the flow possibilities in my mind and first thing I came up with was 2 nanostream 6055's on one end and the outputs of my closed loop on the other (possibly Sequence pump). Then I started thinking about simplifying things and thought maybe vortech's would be best.
Do you think that 2 MP20's would be OK? (both on the same end) or would one MP40 do? Or should I have even more? I've been rrading an awful lot of good things about the vortech route and it seems I could greatly simplify things without sacrificing flow.... is that actually the case? Thanks a lot for your input in advance. Oh, BTW, it's going to be (hopefully) an sps-dominated tank. |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I think your options will depend on your plans for the tank.
I assume you mean that the tank will be viewable from both sides and 1 end pannels? If so having powerheads on the viewable end will kinda suck so i think vortechs on the nonviewable end would be nicer. Also if both side pannels are viewable then the rocks will probably be stacked dpwn the center of the tank so 1 vortec wont be that great, 1 vortech blowing down each side of the rockwork would be much better, mp20's shpuld be plenty in a 36" tank but if the money isnt a factor i would get mp40's and dial them back a bit if needed rather than find out you dont have enough power.
__________________
but what the heck do i know |
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I sent Steve a link to this for his input, he built the same size/design and had things flowing pretty good.
__________________
Brad |
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Since you mentioned a SPS Dominated tank, I'm curious which softies/lps you are looking to keep...
2 MP20's would be 44x turnover + your return from the sump. 2 MP40's would be 71x turnover + your return from the sump. That's only of course if you are running them at 100%.. I think closed loops are great, I got one myself, but I just got my hands on a MP20, and I gotta admit, it is a sweet piece of kit! For you tank I would probably go with 2 MP20's plus your sump return. Only because you might have softies/lps... if it was 100% SPS, I'd recommend the 2x MP40 route.
__________________
180G Office Reef. Started Sept 2012 http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=88894 62G Starfire Reef. Started Jan 2013 http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=89988 |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Thanks a lot, I'd be interested to hear what he has to say. I only want to do this once i.e. the right way the first time! I have wasted so much money on equipment upgrades since I started the hobby, it would boggle the mind!
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() they definatly provide the widest flow pattern but the only way its gonna cove both the viewable sides is if its placed in the center, but having the tank viewable from both sides implies that the rock will be stacked down the center of the tank. is that your plans? if so having 1 vortec in the center is just gonna blow strait into the rocks and not really provide flow to the whole tank,
in my opinion even a mp40 isnt gonna provide overly strong flow after 36" of tank i really think your decision is gonna depend on your layout of the tank and the budget you have to spend.
__________________
but what the heck do i know |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() yep, rock in the middle, maybe in a couple of "towers" with swimming space between. I want a lean layout this time instead of the "wall of rock" i have usually had.
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Then put your flow generator (vortech, tunze, closed loop w/eductor - doesn't really matter which one) in the hidden end off to one side and you'll have a Gyre. It works the same way as a whirlpool that builds up centrifugal force as it spins round and round. It works best with an up/down pulse. If you want really fancy then simply put a flow source alternating on each side for reversing Gyres.
|