![]() |
|
View Poll Results: Which categories are you interested in for the nano contest #2? | |||
stock 5.5 limited budget |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 13.04% |
stock 5.5 unlimited budget |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 4.35% |
stock 10 limited budget |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
16 | 34.78% |
stock 10 unlimited budget |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 4.35% |
custom limited budget |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
27 | 58.70% |
custom unlimited budget |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 21.74% |
other (please post) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 15.22% |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 46. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
Steve
__________________
![]() Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive. |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Well Steve, from your lofty position up there you probably shouldn't be one of those people who set up a tank just to enter a contest either
![]()
__________________
Christy's Reef Blog My 180 Build Every electronic component is shipped with smoke stored deep inside.... only a real genius can find a way to set it free. |
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
Steve
__________________
![]() Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive. Last edited by StirCrazy; 04-21-2009 at 12:58 PM. |
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Yeah I'm thinking I'll just read through everyones opinions, pick out the good ones
![]()
__________________
Christy's Reef Blog My 180 Build Every electronic component is shipped with smoke stored deep inside.... only a real genius can find a way to set it free. |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
I don't think superduperwesman's 10G Plate Coral Nano from the first competition is disposable either. That's alot of work for something he planned to take down after the contest. Sorry, not trying to be confrontational but I just think it is a bit unfair to judge people's intentions here. |
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
![]() yes there will be people who will keep them running, but I do believe the majority of them will be short lived. the real problem comes in as there is no clear definition of what a nano is. I believe a nano is anything under 33 gal, but that could be because I have never had a tank set up under 92 gal in salt water and 20 gal in fresh water (Betta tank) Some one who has only had 180's or larger might think a 55 is a Nano. where as some one who has only had 33's and 20's would think a 5 or less is a nanno, so it all comes down to who can impose there will forcefully enough to decide what a nanno should be. I just felt we already had a Nanno contest, why don't we have a large nanno/medium tank contest with a little more time for the build and a little more budget for equipment to allow for some nice tanks to be built. Steve
__________________
![]() Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive. |
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Steve,
I am sure you are correct that some tanks will be taken down and some will live on. As long as people aren't throwing out their livestock and just putting it all back in a larger display I guess that is okay. I think the nicer nanos with a better shot at winning will be the ones that are intended to last and will therefor probably have more effort put into them. And if you want a larger tank contest why not organize that yourself? I am now probably going to set up a 50 or 65 gallon tank as well so maybe I'll be into that too ![]() |
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() ...okay, see now this is why i think a max budget with no max volume would be a good idea. I don't think anyone in their right mind would try to seriously win this thing while budgeting for a tank over 20g or so anyways; certainly not over 30g, and that's pushing it. It also doesn't technically exclude anyone from entering the contest... so no ruffled feathers. It also allows any sized sump one could want... just have to budget for it. personally my definition of a nano only includes the display, not the sump (unless it is used for display purposes); stability of a system is just a fail safe and if some one wants to incorporate that into a nano, i say kudos; nanos shouldn't have to be unstable. shrug, jmo.
Last edited by justinl; 04-21-2009 at 06:23 PM. |
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
![]() I've already said it in that other thread, but imo a nano is 20 gallons or less. The stock tank categories are interesting because they put a lot of emphasis on livestock selection and aquascaping. I liked that about the first nano contest...although some people took advantage of the [lack of defined] rules. I REALLY think livestock should not have a budget as I believe in the last contest that several of the participants had corals in their tanks that grossly out-valued what was recorded in their budget. In order to make it as painless as possible on you Christy, I think you either need to set out many clearly defined rules with few possibilities for loopholes, or set very few rules, and let people give'r. You are a brave woman after seeing what Josh went through!!! ![]() Last edited by Myka; 04-21-2009 at 06:49 AM. |
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Over the last 10 years, I've never had a system over 25 gallons including the one running in my office now for 4 years... Never thought of any of my tanks as disposable.
__________________
Do you smell that? Just waaalk away...... sloooowly |