Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Polls

View Poll Results: How long is your photoperiod?
4 hours or less 1 0.62%
5 hours 3 1.85%
6 hours 19 11.73%
7 hours 14 8.64%
8 hours 22 13.58%
9 hours 17 10.49%
10 hours 26 16.05%
11 hours 6 3.70%
12 hours 39 24.07%
13 hours 6 3.70%
14 hours or more! 9 5.56%
Voters: 162. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-17-2009, 06:32 PM
brizzo's Avatar
brizzo brizzo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kelowna BC
Posts: 504
brizzo is on a distinguished road
Default

1. 14" Depth
2. 150w HQI, 5" from water
3. Coralife clamp on, stock reflector
4. SPS and LPS
5. No media filter, or skimmer

My photo period is 10 hours a day, and I have some SPS frags about 3" from the water line that are colorful, growing, and encrusting. Pieces I have on the bottom are also doing well, along with Maxima clam that seems to constantly have new skeleton under its mantle

Though I find interest in this 6 hours per day theory, it makes sense with the muscle/workout analogy.
__________________
28g Nano Cube drilled with 13g sump in stock stand. Vertex IN80 Skimmer, Phosban 150 Reactor, Apex Controller, DIY LED with stock hood, dimmable
Established March 2006
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-17-2009, 06:37 PM
michika's Avatar
michika michika is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: YYC
Posts: 5,063
michika is on a distinguished road
Default

I'm amused and interested to read that everyone has lowered their photo periods for the purposes of growth. I did it just to save some cost on energy bills...and it worked. I saw a $40 drop in my bill, which I can't 100% attribute to my lowered MH use, but I do know they contributed.

I also read the thread on RC that a lot of you are referencing. I noticed towards the end, or whenever I stopped reading it, that a lot of people were returning to their old photo periods, or commenting that the growth bursts seem to be short lived. I understood it that people saw some great growth and colouration, and then again it would slow down, but in most cases was still faster growth then when they were running 10 or 12+ hours of lighting.
__________________
+.-.+.-.+.-.+.-.+.-.+.-.+
I glue animals to rocks
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-17-2009, 08:10 PM
BC564 BC564 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chestermere, AB
Posts: 445
BC564 is on a distinguished road
Default

I went to a smaller period to save money....be it energy cost or bulb life.....it all adds up...and if I get the same results.....its all good.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.