![]() |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Well you started off your post by saying you agreed with the fact that larger diameter pipe means more water weight and therefore less flow. Your next statement seemed to be your argument on why you agreed. Sorry for the confusion but I'm not a mind reader
![]() Quote:
Last edited by sphelps; 03-17-2009 at 11:14 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() You guys should listen to Sphelps on this matter or he may just go Bernoulli on you.
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Dan Pesonen Umm, a tank or 5 |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() So that we are are clear on this question, if the pump on the left has reached its maximum head, it would be the same height as the pump on the right with a much larger diameter?
Last edited by golf nut; 03-18-2009 at 01:24 AM. |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() As said big is better for pipe runs and loss due fittings, why I stayed with 1.5" to the bottom of my display.
What I wish for is a calculator that would take into account various line sizes (I'm running a 1.5" return line from the pump but then reduce to 1" at the display bulkhead). |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Hard to believe isn't it, but it is true.
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Bernoulli's equation can be used in all kinds of fluid mechanics, including pipe flow.
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |