Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-12-2009, 06:38 PM
jus68's Avatar
jus68 jus68 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 46
jus68 is on a distinguished road
Default

Stones,

Would you please tell us the T5 bulbs combination you have for your setup and what make?

Thanks,
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-12-2009, 08:31 PM
Stones's Avatar
Stones Stones is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan
Posts: 401
Stones is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jus68 View Post
Stones,

Would you please tell us the T5 bulbs combination you have for your setup and what make?

Thanks,
I'm currently using: 4 Aquascience Blue (22K) bulbs, 1 KZ Fiji Purple, 2 KZ New Gen Coral Light (14K), and 1 Aquascience Special (15K, but looks like a 10K). In reality, my tank actually looks quite a bit bluer than the picture as the white balance on my camera is impossible to get set correctly.

Next bulb change I'd like to try all ATI bulbs since progressive reef now carries them as the pro colour is more subtle than the fiji purple. I'm not a huge fan of the Aquascience Special (15K) either and next time I'd swap it out for another KZ New gen or an Aquascience Duo (17.5K) if I choose not to go all ATI.

Regarding the par tests done on RC, I can't find the thread but I seem to remember the T5 unit being a TEK while the metal halide was a 2 x 250 retro with lumenarc type reflectors. Neither of the setups were being overdriven and the PAR readings were very close which only proves that T5s can produce the same or similar light intensity to metal halide.

If you were to compare apples to apples and make the comparison more fair, you would have to pair up an ATI powermodule or Sfiligoi Stealth against a high end metal halide fixture like Sfiligoi or Giesmann. That being said, both setups used in the test were choosen because they were readily available for purchase and represented the most commonly employed fixtures used for either metal halide or T5s. I'm sure higher PAR levels could have been achieved had they used higher end fixtures but even then PAR readings would likely have been similar as adding active cooling to T5's makes a huge difference while using a better reflector/bulb combo for metal halides also makes a huge difference.
__________________
Do or do not....there is no try.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-12-2009, 08:43 PM
Whatigot Whatigot is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Coquitlam, B.C.
Posts: 680
Whatigot is on a distinguished road
Default

haha...
long story short, you're good either way.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-12-2009, 10:58 PM
lastlight's Avatar
lastlight lastlight is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 6,997
lastlight has a spectacular aura aboutlastlight has a spectacular aura aboutlastlight has a spectacular aura about
Default

Actually I think the lumenarcs pump far more light into the tank than any of the high end pendants so even more cudos to the t5s.
__________________
Brett
My 67 392 225 101 94 34 97 404 28 93 209 gallon reef.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-12-2009, 11:18 PM
i have crabs's Avatar
i have crabs i have crabs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Airdrie
Posts: 1,004
i have crabs is on a distinguished road
Default

length can also be a factor, as my 48" llight with 8 bulbs puts out twice as much par as 8x24"bulbs in my cube
__________________
but what the heck do i know
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-13-2009, 01:05 AM
Stones's Avatar
Stones Stones is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan
Posts: 401
Stones is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by i have crabs View Post
length can also be a factor, as my 48" llight with 8 bulbs puts out twice as much par as 8x24"bulbs in my cube
You are correct that the 48" fixture will have a higher PAR output than the 24" fixture with the same amount of bulbs. Length however is not the determining factor as T5's will produce identical PAR ratings along the length of the bulb no matter where you take the measurement. The reason why the 48" fixture will produce more PAR is due to the bulbs being 54 watts as opposed to 24 watts. The same increase in PAR would also be seen if you were to overdrive the 48" T5 bulbs on an icecap ballast.

Have you done PAR testing on your two different fixtures? I'm always curious to see results from different T5 fixtures.
__________________
Do or do not....there is no try.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.