![]() |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Perhaps you could borrow a unit from a fellow reefer to try it out before shelling out the $ to see if you like. I have had one on my tank for the last three years and am happy with it, I have dual corner overflows and the noise is not that bad as the waves are pretty constant so it kind of finds a rythm.
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
![]() I am pretty sure I want one over the vortech but I would really love to use the smaller one (cheaper and smaller). Only problem is whether its worth it with less flow. I doubt it now though. Sounds like the regular size one is the way to go. I guess the bigger one would take up more room but would also create most of the flow for my tank. |
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I doubt the nano would work very well with a 6' tank. You could ask Roger Vitko to be sure.
I actually run a Wavebox with an external Herbie overflow on the opposite end. After much experimentation I found that the best way to keep the overflow silent is to have the overflow filled to the top of the emergency drain with just a trickle of water going down the emergency drain. If the water level is any lower the waves that the wavebox creates makes a lot of noise as they constantly wash over the edge and down into the overflow. Tunze actually recommends a center overflow with a wavebox to minimize the effect of the waves on the draining action of the overflow. If you were to go with the vortech, it would look even uglier than the wavebox if you had to put it on the exposed end of the tank because of the wires hanging on the OUTSIDE of the tank. |
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
I think either way its going to look bad but the wavebox will be a bit easier on the eyes and also give better flow. Right now I have two ugly powerheads on that side of the tank anyways! Sounds like I would have to go with the regular wavebox. I just though I may be able to get away with the smaller one since the tank is so shallow. |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Yeah the guys in the Tunze forum over at RC are saying it would not preform right on a 6' tank. So either the regular size one or the Vortech. Hmmmm....
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() What about having a wave box on the wall side of the room and not out in the open side?
It will work as wel as on the oposite side and you dont have to run the cables over the tank. Last edited by RuGlu6; 01-16-2009 at 10:27 AM. |
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
So basically just aesthetic reasons. Anyone using a MP40 know if it will create a wave across a 6' tank? |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() any chance you could run a nano and then a second nano inline?
MY nano rocks my 48' 72 gallon. I'm getting a 95 (48X18X24) this weekend and don't expect it to do any less of a fantastic job... |
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
I think I am starting to wonder though if I want a big black box in my tank ![]() Even if I re-aquascaped and moved the big cap or sold it, I can't put the wavebox on that end of the tank because it will interfere with my overflow. Hard to explain but I have looked into it and it will not work. So...I have to keep most of the flow coming from the one side of the tank which mean powerheads kind of suck. I don't want continuous flow. The best reef tanks you see around have much more random and back and forth flow, which you really only get from a wavebox or closed loop with some kind of wavemaker. Or I guess controllable powerheads. I am just not convinced that any powerhead is going to give me the flow I want down the entire tank. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() you don't even notice the nano...
Honestly, it is so slim, 2 would not take up much real estate at all. |