Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Tank Journal

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 05-27-2008, 05:31 PM
sphelps's Avatar
sphelps sphelps is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lyalta, East of Calgary
Posts: 4,777
sphelps is on a distinguished road
Default

so 15mm then.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 05-27-2008, 05:41 PM
Parker's Avatar
Parker Parker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,012
Parker is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sphelps View Post
so 15mm then.

Would that need to be 15mm x 4" or 6"

Sorry to be a pain
__________________
Robb
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 05-27-2008, 07:26 PM
sphelps's Avatar
sphelps sphelps is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lyalta, East of Calgary
Posts: 4,777
sphelps is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Parker View Post
Would that need to be 15mm x 4" or 6"

Sorry to be a pain
No worries I was actually just confirming glass thickness.

Here's what I got for you:

First off this analysis may not be correct in actual displacement values as representing silicon seams and dynamic behavior is difficult and unnecessary.

So we start off by seeing what you had before, not intirely sure but my experience shows most of these larger tanks have 18" wide center brace with about a 1" trim around the top:

This is showing a displacement of 0.26mm and a somewhat unhealthy displacement pattern.

The goal here would be to at least match the displacement, as already stated the actual number isn't important, we just want to come close to matching it.

First lets compare to no bracing:

This shows max displacement of 2.22mm, so center brace does a lot.

Now lets try a 15mm x 4" Euro Brace, bigger than 4" and it's awkward, any smaller than 4" and the glass shop will be b*tching.

This shows 0.36mm max displacement and a healthier displacement pattern. This will be good, not much difference from the center brace.

However we'll take it one step further and place in 2 center braces 4" wide. Not ideal but better than the large one in the center.

Well look at that 0.26mm max and way better displacement pattern than the center brace alone.

I leave the choice up to you, but it's interesting to see, that center brace does a good job no wonder the manufacturers use them, cheap and effective. Just sucks for us.

HTH
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 05-27-2008, 07:38 PM
Parker's Avatar
Parker Parker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,012
Parker is on a distinguished road
Default

Holy Crap!

I can't thank you enough for that. I think I'm going to go for option 4.. I'd rather be safe then sorry.
__________________
Robb
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 05-27-2008, 07:45 PM
mark's Avatar
mark mark is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Edmonton AB
Posts: 4,212
mark is on a distinguished road
Default

neat analysis plots

Robb you had 3 400w, seems the brace breaking might have been for the best for positioning your reflectors for coverage (***** about the extra cost and hassle though)
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 05-27-2008, 07:57 PM
sphelps's Avatar
sphelps sphelps is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lyalta, East of Calgary
Posts: 4,777
sphelps is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Parker View Post
Holy Crap!

I can't thank you enough for that. I think I'm going to go for option 4.. I'd rather be safe then sorry.
No problem, glad to help.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 05-27-2008, 08:14 PM
Parker's Avatar
Parker Parker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,012
Parker is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mark View Post
neat analysis plots

Robb you had 3 400w, seems the brace breaking might have been for the best for positioning your reflectors for coverage (***** about the extra cost and hassle though)

Yeah in the end I'll be much better off with that brace being gone. But your right, it will be a pain in the !@# getting there.
__________________
Robb
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 05-27-2008, 08:49 PM
Delphinus's Avatar
Delphinus Delphinus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Posts: 12,896
Delphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via MSN to Delphinus
Default

Wow those stress plots are really cool!! [/nerd]
__________________
-- Tony
My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee!
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 05-27-2008, 09:32 PM
bassman bassman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Quesnel, BC
Posts: 313
bassman is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Delphinus View Post
Wow those stress plots are really cool!! [/nerd]
Ditto!

They helped me make a decision I have been struggling with. Thanks!
__________________




230 mixed reef / 230 gal sump/fuge
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 05-27-2008, 10:03 PM
sphelps's Avatar
sphelps sphelps is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lyalta, East of Calgary
Posts: 4,777
sphelps is on a distinguished road
Default

They're actually displacement plots, I figured they would be benificial to most people with similar tanks.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
265 gallon, closed loops


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.