Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-16-2008, 06:38 AM
bv_reefer's Avatar
bv_reefer bv_reefer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Burnaby,BC
Posts: 734
bv_reefer is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fkshiu View Post
Old school reefers actually would want MORE evaporation - why? It allowed more the addition of more kalk. The need for kalk has lessened with the advent of Ca reactors and two-part dosing, but you should still take full advantage of your tank's ability to shed water. Kalk helps maintain Ca/Alk and keeps your pH up, plus it's dirt cheap in bulk (relatively speaking). Just get an ATO if you don't want to top up manually.

Anyway, glass tops cut down on PAR significantly. Just check out Sanjay's spectral plots of shielded vs unshielded MH bulbs.
do they really cut down on PAR that much? i remember one of the staff members mentioning that it barely lowered PAR by a few percent, and that some 95'ish% of light gets through, good to know though
__________________
33g fowlr / 20g sump / 400 watt pendant / Euro-Reef RC80~~~~lavendar tang, lemon butterfly, snowflake eel, hawaiian spotted puffer, tomato clown, chomis..

My reef~http://i297.photobucket.com/albums/m...-/P4300459.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-16-2008, 04:39 PM
fkshiu's Avatar
fkshiu fkshiu is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,499
fkshiu is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bv_reefer View Post
do they really cut down on PAR that much? i remember one of the staff members mentioning that it barely lowered PAR by a few percent, and that some 95'ish% of light gets through, good to know though
Here are Sanjay's results for 150W DE HQI bulbs both with and without a 1/8" glass shield:

http://www.reeflightinginfo.arvixe.c...&Submit=Submit

The glass causes a good 20% loss of PPFD (a.k.a. PAR) for nearly all bulbs.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-16-2008, 06:02 PM
bv_reefer's Avatar
bv_reefer bv_reefer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Burnaby,BC
Posts: 734
bv_reefer is on a distinguished road
Default

thanks for the link, 19% up for me! unreal it was thin glass too, 3mm
__________________
33g fowlr / 20g sump / 400 watt pendant / Euro-Reef RC80~~~~lavendar tang, lemon butterfly, snowflake eel, hawaiian spotted puffer, tomato clown, chomis..

My reef~http://i297.photobucket.com/albums/m...-/P4300459.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-17-2008, 04:04 AM
kwirky's Avatar
kwirky kwirky is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,127
kwirky is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fkshiu View Post
Here are Sanjay's results for 150W DE HQI bulbs both with and without a 1/8" glass shield:

http://www.reeflightinginfo.arvixe.c...&Submit=Submit

The glass causes a good 20% loss of PPFD (a.k.a. PAR) for nearly all bulbs.
and that's WITHOUT 1/8" salt creep built up on the glass to boot. you'll lose a lot of light so it's a major tradeoff you'd have to consider if running a glass top.

using egg crate on halides is a bit of a pain with most reflectors because it'll block a lotta light on the outer edges. egg crate's really only best for flourescent lighting. maybe look into an auto-top off unit? i love mine.

a good ol' canopy works wonders for keeping fish in
__________________
Everything I put in my tank is fully dependant on me.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.