|
|
|
|
|
#1
04-08-2008, 03:05 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
Jason - get to work
 Seriously though I have done my share of reading on carbon on RC and I can't find any literature that states that the ROX is 2x more effective. I would like somebody to prove me wrong so I don't have to keep reading about all these numbers linked to carbon. On another note, I've only used regular carbon in the past 6-7 years and I've never tried this ROX which is suppose to be harder. But I've never had an issue with carbon dust with the regular carbon. So does it being harder mean its more effective or harder means it doesn't create as much carbon dust?
__________________
____________ If people don't die, it wouldn't make living important. And why do we fall? So we can learn to pick ourselves up. 
|
|
#2
04-08-2008, 03:18 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Interesting quick glace at the articles posted by Bulk Reef Supply on the best carbon. Based on this article http://www.pets-warehouse.com/carbon.htm
- it states that the best carbons are lignite and rough shaped. - second best carbons are bituminous - the worse carbons are all pellet shaped. Based on the product descriptions of the lignite and ROX: - the lignite being sold is rough shaped - the ROX is pellet shaped - the ROX has both lignite and bituminous properties Does the pricing and product description contradict their effectiveness in the articles?
__________________
____________ If people don't die, it wouldn't make living important. And why do we fall? So we can learn to pick ourselves up.
|
|
#3
04-08-2008, 03:26 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
OA used to sell the ROX pellet in bulk. too bad his supplier stops selling it. I found it way more effective that the Black Diamond I'm using today. J
|
|
#4
04-08-2008, 04:03 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
PMed
I use the Matrix carbon now. The round shape and higher density makes them work well in a reactor.
|
Hybrid Mode
