![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() a 24g tank is pretty hard to keep consistent water parameters
zero fluctuations is the key too success,maybe not so many water changes would be better or a bigger tank.I would always go with the bigger tank advise,its more self satisfying BOOYA |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
![]() The temp changes between 79.6 (the lowest I've seen) to 81.9 (the highest I've seen). Last edited by michika; 02-16-2008 at 04:09 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I wouldnt worry bout mag as so much as temp. and salinity fluctuations.Thats why I mentioned the frequent water changes.Maybe just do one larger one every 2 weeks to let the water stabalize.2 in one week could be too much for a small reef tank
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I also received this PM with suggestions;
hey i have been reading your post on problems with sps. i notice that you have black sand? im not really sure on the chemcial composition ... i would remove it and run a bare bottom or very light layer of calcium based substrate. the reason i say this is because most black sands are highly composed of silica... silica is a major component in micoalga and other microorganisms biological makeup. - I actually run a bare bottom system. The black sand I think you are referring to was from my old tank which I tore down in November. the water changes also... i wouldnt change that much every week.... i rarely change the water at all in my tank.... maybe a few gallons a month.. adding new salt can change the conditions in the water rapidly even if there only small amounts. - I've always had better success with SPS growth and keeping GHA in check. However, I will see what happens if I go say every two weeks between a 7g water change. testing for chemicals such as nitrates and phosphates can be useless... chemical reagents go bad so quick that they dont give accurate readings...as well the hair alga is sucking up so fast you cant specify where it is comming from. make sure they are new tests .. and that always airtight.. - There is no more GHA, just a few pieces, so I think I have beat it. its always fun to go high tech with calcium reactors and phosphoban and kalk mixers.... try removing them.... and go tot he very basic.. carbon ... and just plain additives (bottle liquid). - I can certainly take them offline and see what happens. Can you explain why a liquid additive would be a better choice? from there you can start to determin what is wrong. maybe even use a different salt. its easier to find something wrong when you have a minimal set up... compaired to and elaborate one. then you can always add them slowly. just my thoughts ... hope everything gets better dave - Thank you for your suggestions, it is quite a bit to think about. On another note I forgot to provide the original links to the tank journals; Current tank; 28g Long Previous Tank; 24g cube |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Catherine, if i were you I think I would leave the tank alone for a while (as hard as that is to do).
I don't know what fish you have but minimal feedings, no water changes (just top off), dose a 2 part as needed, keep your hands out of the tank ![]() Low Mg will inhibit coralline algae growth but i don't think it would make your sps die Of course you might not want to listen to my advice my tank isn't doing great right now ![]() *edit*Looking at your parameters I'm wondering if maybe you aren't getting a bit of precipitation and that is why the mg is so low. It might be worthwhile to take the calcium reactor and kalk off line and find out exactly how much alk and cal you are actually using in a day Last edited by marie; 02-16-2008 at 04:36 AM. |
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Keeping my hands out of the tank isn't a problem. I loath the dry skin that comes after having my hands in the tank. I can definitely stick with the no hands in the tank policy.
![]() I'll keep working with the Mg, at the rate I'm going it will probably take until the end of the month to get it up where I want it. Can you tell me more about precipitation? I thought precipitation was always white. I don't see any white though. Can precipitation not be white? I'm going to go google precipitation, but I figure that you would probably know ![]() My kalk. reactor has actually been offline since the 11th. I just realized I never put it back offline once I reloaded the kalk. powder, oops! I'll take the Ca. reactor offline too. How would I go about figuring out my daily usage? Would I just measure the parameters every day and then average out the differences? Just because I'm curious; if my reactors are dialed in properly, and I am seeing a consistent set of numbers for Ca and dKH without precipitation wouldn't that mean that I'm meeting the daily usage? Does that even make sense? I think I'm confusing myself ![]() So here I guess is my plan for the next while, tell me if I've got something wrong; - Return my water changes to 1x7g/week. For clairification, the 2x7g/week water change was when I combatting the GHA. - Continue to raise my Mg. Should I still do this while I'm trying to calculate daily usage on Ca, and Alk.? - Take reactors offline - Measure daily consumption of Ca, alk, and mg? Last edited by michika; 02-16-2008 at 04:54 AM. |