![]() |
|
View Poll Results: what wattage MH do you use with 24'' depth | |||
150 watt MH 24" depth |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 18.52% |
175 watt MH 24" depth |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 7.41% |
250 watt MH 24'' depth |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
17 | 62.96% |
400 watt MH 24" depth |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 11.11% |
Voters: 27. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Concrete data on running SE bulbs on HQI ballasts (or any other type of MH combo for that matter): http://www.reeflightinginfo.arvixe.com/
I have an 18" deep tank running a lot of friggin' light as you can see from my sig. I keep my crocea clam on the bottom no problem. Some of my LPS bleach even down on the bottom so I have to hide them in shadowy areas. SPS should be placed up high regardless since that's where the wide open flow they prefer is located. Look on any natural reef - the SPS are always located at the reef crest. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() The idea i'm leaning towards is running the PFO fixture with 250 watt SE bulbs and the 250 watt Hamilton HQI ballasts.
From what I have read PFO reflectors are decent. and the Hamilton ballasts seem to be decent. What brand of bulbs would you suggest for output and longevity? I guess the normal rules don't apply as these bulbs are running out of there intended parameters. I'm not really interested in replicating a natural reef. My main objective is Aesthetics , but still have the corals happy. High flow will be consistent throughout the tank, so that will not be a concern. |
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
Steve
__________________
![]() Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive. |