Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

View Poll Results: what wattage MH do you use with 24'' depth
150 watt MH 24" depth 5 18.52%
175 watt MH 24" depth 2 7.41%
250 watt MH 24'' depth 17 62.96%
400 watt MH 24" depth 3 11.11%
Voters: 27. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-25-2007, 04:43 AM
scumchug scumchug is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Victoria
Posts: 89
scumchug is on a distinguished road
Default

Thanks for the input guys. I should have been more specific. The 400w fixture is a PFO system and has dual 96w VHO's. and the 250w fixture is a Hamilton HQI and has dual 56w HO T5's. The tank will start off being mostly SPS ( acro's & monty's) but feel that I will start mixing in more LPS as time progresses. I'm not going to get rid of the SPS but I miss the vivid colors and beauty that LPS bring to the tank. I'm not going to get rid of the SPS. Heat has always been a problem for me. I have dual chillers. One for the daily chore of chilling, and one for backup just in case the primary one quits.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-25-2007, 05:35 AM
mark's Avatar
mark mark is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Edmonton AB
Posts: 4,212
mark is on a distinguished road
Default

Might take a look through some of the Tank of the Month articles for similiar size/shape tank to yours and get ideas what the TOTM people are using.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-25-2007, 06:35 AM
StirCrazy's Avatar
StirCrazy StirCrazy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kamloops, BC
Posts: 7,872
StirCrazy is on a distinguished road
Default

you missed an option, 250 watt SE bulbs driven by HQI ballasts. suprisingly will give you a higher output than a 400 watt. at anyrate a normal 250 should be good, anything deeper than 24" and I would recomend the HQI 250 ballasts and SE bulbs or the 400's

Steve
__________________
*everything said above is just my opinion, and may or may not reflect the views of this BBS, its Operators, and its Members. If cornered on any “opinion” I post I will totally deny having ever said this in a Court of Law…Unless I am the right one*

Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-25-2007, 08:46 AM
scumchug scumchug is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Victoria
Posts: 89
scumchug is on a distinguished road
Default

Good point. I may as well go that route. I have the 250watt ballasts. All i need to do is put 250watt bulbs in the 400 watt fixture, and run it with the HQI ballasts. More light than the 400's with the power consumption of the 250's. Great thinking. Why didn't I think of that?? thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-25-2007, 05:54 PM
scumchug scumchug is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Victoria
Posts: 89
scumchug is on a distinguished road
Default

I see the majority of people are using 250 watt lights. Do you keep the more light demanding SPS? and how low are you able to keep them in the tank? The way I understand it is that 250w is enough light, but penetration becomes an issue. Will high light SPS (acro's) flourish at the lower depths?

I can't seem to find any concrete data on running 250 watt SE bulbs with HQI ballasts. I understand that the light output is more, but can't find anything stating just how much.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-25-2007, 06:24 PM
StirCrazy's Avatar
StirCrazy StirCrazy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kamloops, BC
Posts: 7,872
StirCrazy is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scumchug View Post
I see the majority of people are using 250 watt lights. Do you keep the more light demanding SPS? and how low are you able to keep them in the tank? The way I understand it is that 250w is enough light, but penetration becomes an issue. Will high light SPS (acro's) flourish at the lower depths?

I can't seem to find any concrete data on running 250 watt SE bulbs with HQI ballasts. I understand that the light output is more, but can't find anything stating just how much.
you can grow SPS in a 24" tank with 150 bulbs, it is all a factor on what you want your limiting factor to be, food, light, ect.. and yes people are growing them with T5's and they are not even close to the output of a MH, but better than PC or VHO.

Ok, 250 watt is more than enough light for a 24" or less tank, almost all 250 watt bulbs are based off of European bulbs and hence the design is for European power specs, all a M80 ballast is doing is reproducing a European output from North American power input. it is more stable, easier on the bulbs starting and actually drives the bulbs properly, not overdriven. (non of this applies to a so called 400 watt HQI, because there is no such thing)

anyways I ran this type of set up for about 6 years with no problems and increased bulb life (measured with my PAR meter, not a guess) and I was growing out frags on the bottom of my tank no problem. So to answer your question, yes they will flourish with any type of 250 watt set up.

another thing to note is reflectors are just as important as the bulb and ballast combo, My 250 watt set up was putting out more PAR than a Iwasaki 400 watt system, I attribute this to the HQI ballast running the AB bulb to proper specs, and the home made reflector I was using. look at the different reflectors out there and spend the extra 15 bucks on a good one.

be careful of electronic HQI ballasts though as most under drive the bulb. Lately there have been good ones coming out though.

Steve
__________________
*everything said above is just my opinion, and may or may not reflect the views of this BBS, its Operators, and its Members. If cornered on any “opinion” I post I will totally deny having ever said this in a Court of Law…Unless I am the right one*

Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-25-2007, 06:29 PM
fkshiu's Avatar
fkshiu fkshiu is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,499
fkshiu is on a distinguished road
Default

Concrete data on running SE bulbs on HQI ballasts (or any other type of MH combo for that matter): http://www.reeflightinginfo.arvixe.com/

I have an 18" deep tank running a lot of friggin' light as you can see from my sig. I keep my crocea clam on the bottom no problem. Some of my LPS bleach even down on the bottom so I have to hide them in shadowy areas.

SPS should be placed up high regardless since that's where the wide open flow they prefer is located. Look on any natural reef - the SPS are always located at the reef crest.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-25-2007, 07:30 PM
scumchug scumchug is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Victoria
Posts: 89
scumchug is on a distinguished road
Default

The idea i'm leaning towards is running the PFO fixture with 250 watt SE bulbs and the 250 watt Hamilton HQI ballasts.

From what I have read PFO reflectors are decent. and the Hamilton ballasts seem to be decent.

What brand of bulbs would you suggest for output and longevity? I guess the normal rules don't apply as these bulbs are running out of there intended parameters.

I'm not really interested in replicating a natural reef. My main objective is Aesthetics , but still have the corals happy. High flow will be consistent throughout the tank, so that will not be a concern.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.