![]() |
|
View Poll Results: Are switching to T5 | |||
Yes |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
25 | 20.33% |
No |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
43 | 34.96% |
What is T5? |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 4.07% |
Already have, and I'll never go back! |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
23 | 18.70% |
Been there done that going back to MH |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
9 | 7.32% |
Thought about it, maybe next tank. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
18 | 14.63% |
Voters: 123. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I am trying them on my fresh water planted tank, I'll let you know what I think when I have had them more than a week
Steve
__________________
![]() Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive. |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() That's interesting. I wonder if I will see any benefits of T5 in my 3'x1' tank. Currently, I have 2x150W HQI for a total of 300W of MH. If I go with T5, I can fit a max of 6 lights x 39W for a total of 234W of T5. I would love to find out which is a better setup between these two.
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
My next tank (36x36x20") will have the same MH but I will add 2 more of the same actinics. I'm convinced that T5's are a very viable light souce, the only down fall is that they don't shimmer.
__________________
THE BARQUARIUM: 55 gallon cube - 50 lbs LR - ASM G3 skimmer - 30 Gallon sump - 22 Gallon refugium / frag tank - 4x 24 watt HO T5's - Mag 9.5 return - Pin Point PH monitor - 400 watt XM 20K MH in Lumenarc reflector - Dual stage GFO/NO3 media reactor - 6 stage RODI auto top up -Wavemaster Pro running 3 Koralia 2's. Fully stocked with fish, corals and usually some fine scotch http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=55041 |
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I'm not saying that it is or isn't better because of quantity. I'm just hoping to come across some more data on it so that I can make an informed decision before I decide to switch or not.
Last edited by Samw; 12-12-2007 at 05:34 AM. |