![]() |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() oh, right, sand beds. My findings are with and without a sand bed.
__________________
Brad |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() If it wasn't the rock, what else would it be? Well, OK, actually, I'll say that I don't think it's the rock, but my understanding has always been that the rock is a convenient "container" for the anaerobic bacterial strains that do the denitrification. Other things can shelter those species of bacteria just as well but rock is one of them. Continuing this line of reasoning, I think that some rock is better than others at harbouring bacteria than others, and, I think you can have an event which causes you to lose bacteria and thus remove or deminish a rock's ability to perform denitrification (but conversely, I think that rock can also thus be renewed).
__________________
-- Tony My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee! |
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I concur with Tony and the others, but I'd be curious to know what one would look for in rock that is better at harboring bacteria.
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I think mainly the porosity, or perhaps it's better stated as the "ratio between surface area and volume (and/or mass)".
__________________
-- Tony My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee! |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Anywhere where dissolved oxygen is depleted (anaerobic) bacteria can use nitrates instead of oxygen to respire. However in order for the process to work you need some kind of electron donor or carbon source such as methanol or ethanol. Or something like that, basically if you rock houses these anaerobic zones then denitrification could occur but not to an effective level without constant addition of a carbon source. This is why some people does vodka (ethanol).
All this theory about denitrification in the aquarium with the use of live rock and deep sand beds IMO is over rated, and I don't think much of any denitrification processes are occurring in our aquariums, in the ocean yes, but it's just not feasible in the aquarium. |
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Out of curiosty how do you dose vodka?
Quote:
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I believe the rule of thumb is 1ml per 100 gallons.
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Well LR must do something as I'm BB and test usually 0.0 or 0.2 NO3 (or got a bum Salifert testkit).
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
I like to believe the rock is doing it, but how does the water reach the anaerobic areas within the rock at sufficient turnover to process the entire tank? And I'm not certain you need a carbon source with these bacteria, now you're gonna make me have to hit the books again. ![]()
__________________
Brad |
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I'll pose a corollary question then, why do other long running systems, when even feeding "lightly" and lightly stocked, always show trace amount of nitrates (namely my tanks ... or in some cases, show ridiculous amounts of nitrates)?
I'll say one thing about carbon dosing though, 3 weeks of "Polyp Laps Reef-resh" has done what a year of running sulfur could not, and for the first time in well over a year I have sub-10 nitrate readings in my ritteri tank. Wish I knew what the difference was with this tank and its resistance/resilience to denitrification... it's really weird.
__________________
-- Tony My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee! |