![]() |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() As untamed commented I would strain the overflow with a filter bag in the sump. Much easier to clean and will not effect the 'Herbie" (why isn't this called a Therlow)
Filter Bag |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Just slip it over the exit tube of the overflow. It's best to get 4 or 5 so as they get dirty your can through a bunch of them in the wash.
J |
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() So do you mean I should have nothing inside the overflow over the bulkhead, just the filter sock in the sump?
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Yup.
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Oh ok. I had thought about doing that when I was drawing up the plans but when I looked at other peoples "herbie" style overflows, they all had some kind of strainers in the overflow. I like the idea of having the strainer (filter sock) in the sump instead because that seems way easier. Thanks for the idea!
What about flow through the sump/refugium? I still want to use a Sequence Dart for the return pump and another Dart for the closed loop. I think that would give the tank enough flow. I would prefer not to have to use any powerheads. |
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() ya Darts hould do the trick
J |