|
|
|
|
|
#1
06-24-2007, 04:07 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
Mike, I have one. I've had it for about 8 months, and then just a week or so ago, I kept finding it upside down, with its arms eaten away (or melting away?). Now it's been upside down in the same spot for a few days, and I'm not hopeful. I've been following the thread regarding the orange starfish that died, and am just wondering if they're better off not living in our tanks!
__________________
~Drew 10G Nano * 10G Sump * Deltec MCE 600 Skimmer * JBL Viper 150w MH * Zeovit * Vortech MP40W Millions long for immortality who do not know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon. ~S. Ertz  
|
|
#2
06-24-2007, 07:46 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
I think that most stars are bad news.
 It seems we have two categories: Either they are carnivorous and thus not reef-safe, or they are "we haven't a friggin clue what it eats" (to try and sum up all the articles I've ever read about the topic).Some of the "we don't know what it eats" stars do adapt to life in captivity but the numbers are pretty grim, probably like 1 in 10 or something like that. I did have a blue linckia that lived for about a year and a half. Is that a good run? I have no idea. But that guy was about one in about 5 or 6 stars that I've tried - the others never made it past a month or two.
__________________
-- Tony My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee!
|
|
#3
06-24-2007, 08:05 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
i think 1 in 10 is a VERY generous number. keep in mind people that tony knows what he's doin. think about the countless stars (lickia or otherwise) that people impulse buy just cuz they're pretty. i think a more realistic number is 1 in 30.
|
Hybrid Mode
