![]() |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() That doesn't really look like the one I saw. The LFS called it a double star. The one I saw was whiteish with a star outline on it's body. It was also fat looking with short arms.
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() ive had a couple over time but they just melted after a couple months every time,
__________________
but what the heck do i know |
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Mike, I have one. I've had it for about 8 months, and then just a week or so ago, I kept finding it upside down, with its arms eaten away (or melting away?). Now it's been upside down in the same spot for a few days, and I'm not hopeful. I've been following the thread regarding the orange starfish that died, and am just wondering if they're better off not living in our tanks!
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I think that most stars are bad news.
![]() Some of the "we don't know what it eats" stars do adapt to life in captivity but the numbers are pretty grim, probably like 1 in 10 or something like that. I did have a blue linckia that lived for about a year and a half. Is that a good run? I have no idea. But that guy was about one in about 5 or 6 stars that I've tried - the others never made it past a month or two.
__________________
-- Tony My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee! |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() i think 1 in 10 is a VERY generous number. keep in mind people that tony knows what he's doin. think about the countless stars (lickia or otherwise) that people impulse buy just cuz they're pretty. i think a more realistic number is 1 in 30.
|