Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-19-2007, 04:25 AM
fkshiu's Avatar
fkshiu fkshiu is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,499
fkshiu is on a distinguished road
Default

There is no reason not to use DI-only water in the GVRD. I used to use DI only water when I had a 46 gallon in the form of an AP Tapwater Filter. The only reason why I went RO/DI is because the AP just couldn't produce enough DI water conveniently for a 150g system.

I believe OA uses DI-only water the last time I checked there.

A full-out RO/DI system is an added measure of filtration when the water quality does go down such as what happened around here last winter - although the pre-filters took the brunt of the extra turbidity rather than the RO membrane.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-19-2007, 04:45 AM
ClubReef's Avatar
ClubReef ClubReef is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 140
ClubReef is on a distinguished road
Default

DI is for final water polishing via Ion exchange..it's like squeezing the last drop out of a sponge. The bulk of the filtering process is done through the RO membrane. Here are some stats from Spectra Pure website www.spectrapure.com:

RO unit:
remove over 98% of all ionic impurities
remove over 95% of organic impurities
remove colloidal and particulate impurities
remove microorganisms and pyrogens
remove chlorine, chloramines, pesticides etc.

RODI unit:
remove over 99.9% of all ionic impurities
remove over 95% of organic impurities
remove colloidal and particulate impurities
remove microorganisms and pyrogens
remove chlorine, chloramines, pesticides etc.

In my opinion, why bother with the DI filtering if you're going to skip out on the reverse osmosis step that takes out 98% of the ionic impurites? DI is a marketing gimick IMO..it's to sell the dang unit..in most applications it's not needed.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-19-2007, 05:34 AM
Chin_Lee's Avatar
Chin_Lee Chin_Lee is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Surrey, B.C.
Posts: 2,208
Chin_Lee is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to Chin_Lee
Default then how?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ClubReef View Post
DI is for final water polishing via Ion exchange..it's like squeezing the last drop out of a sponge. The bulk of the filtering process is done through the RO membrane. Here are some stats from Spectra Pure website www.spectrapure.com:

RO unit:
remove over 98% of all ionic impurities
remove over 95% of organic impurities
remove colloidal and particulate impurities
remove microorganisms and pyrogens
remove chlorine, chloramines, pesticides etc.

RODI unit:
remove over 99.9% of all ionic impurities
remove over 95% of organic impurities
remove colloidal and particulate impurities
remove microorganisms and pyrogens
remove chlorine, chloramines, pesticides etc.

In my opinion, why bother with the DI filtering if you're going to skip out on the reverse osmosis step that takes out 98% of the ionic impurites? DI is a marketing gimick IMO..it's to sell the dang unit..in most applications it's not needed.
but how do you explain 0 TDS reading on the output on DI only filtered water?
__________________
____________
If people don't die, it wouldn't make living important.
And why do we fall? So we can learn to pick ourselves up.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-19-2007, 05:45 AM
ClubReef's Avatar
ClubReef ClubReef is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 140
ClubReef is on a distinguished road
Default

You get 0 tds reading on a DI only cartridge? I can see 8% TDS down to 6% or so..but complete 0? I can't explain ...but if it's that simple and you trust your TDS meter than it's obviously eliminating dissolved solids.. Mechanically I can't see how it can be complete 0 though??

From an 8% to a 0% drop means that all of the content in the original water is in the form of Ionic impurities. This implies that there were no Organic impurities, particalte impurties, microorgasms, chlorine, pesticides etc in your original water because DI does not eliminate these..only ionic components through ion exchange...see where I'm going here ??

Last edited by ClubReef; 06-19-2007 at 05:59 AM. Reason: Adding addition Comments
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-19-2007, 08:09 AM
skylord skylord is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maple Ridge BC
Posts: 346
skylord is on a distinguished road
Default

I was asked to try this a couple of months ago and found my TDS meter also reads 0% with DI only. Ive been using DI water since and I'm not noticing any adverse effects. With my current system it works well for me. When we get into our new home and the larger system is running I think I will go back to RO/DI but my system will be more automated.

Scott
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-19-2007, 02:11 PM
Quagmire's Avatar
Quagmire Quagmire is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Calgary
Posts: 588
Quagmire is on a distinguished road
Default

I think the biggest reason we use RO is to lengthen the life of the DI resin.If you only use DI,the resin will have to be of a very high quality (not mixed bed)or you will be recharging between every use.Ive been looking into this for quite a while now and it seems Kati/ani from Germany is the way to go.Seems expensive at first,but the life of the resin and the ability to recharge numerous time would make it worth looking at.Also if you are having a problem finding lye for recharges,check out the soap stores.Lye is used to make soap,and these places usually sell it for making home made soap.
__________________
No matter how hard you try, you can't baptise cats.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-19-2007, 02:26 PM
Jason McK's Avatar
Jason McK Jason McK is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ladner,BC
Posts: 3,032
Jason McK is on a distinguished road
Default

I'd be very curious to find out what stage of our 5 stage units is removing most DS. simpley removing the RO membrane may not be the best proof that the DI is the filter since we all have a carbon filter and a pre filter. Could it be possible that in GVRD a prefilter carbon filter and DI is all that is required?

J
__________________
My old Tank Shut down Jan 2011
New 220G build about to start
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-19-2007, 04:42 PM
SusanB SusanB is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 9
SusanB is on a distinguished road
Default

What kind of system uses 150 gallons to yield 50 gallons? Our reject at work was only about 10% (but that's for Vancouver water). Still, a reject of 66% is way out of wack. People initially went to RO because it was cheaper and the membranes lasted longer, but it does depend on your feed water, prefiltration etc, as well as what you're trying to remove from your water.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-19-2007, 04:46 AM
Zylumn Zylumn is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary , NW
Posts: 274
Zylumn is on a distinguished road
Default

You are very lucky to have a tds reading of 8 out of your tap. Yesterday 184 out of mine. At 8 my fish and water bottle would get it right out of the tap.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-19-2007, 04:58 AM
ClubReef's Avatar
ClubReef ClubReef is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 140
ClubReef is on a distinguished road
Default

This time of year in Calgary is extremely bad due to mountain run offs.....I bet if we did a study on Non RO reefers in Calgary, most will experience some sort of algae bloom this time of year??? Our water is sad
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.