![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
I have a 29" deep tank and I love the look of the deep tank. Working near the bottom is a huge pain and forget wearing anything with sleeves or using deodorant
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Hrm... I can think of an 8' x 30" x 30" (or was it 32 tall) tank in our midst - personally I think it's awesome - but I know the owners a bit picky about his tongs suddenly
__________________
By reading, replying to, commenting about, or in any way accessing the material in this post; including but not limited to storing in a database, retrieving from a database, viewing in a web browser, including it in or making a reference to it in a legal document, or accidentally glancing at it you agree to send me $100. |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
I have a 78lX36wX30h and yes getting to the bottom can be a pain. But it's not impossible and actually I have never lost andything in the tank. Even those presious frags that won't stay stuck have always been reachable. But 26 would be a good compremize.
At 8' you're looking at at least 4 x 400W MH in order to maintain SPS and Clams IMO Keep us updated love to follow new tank projects J |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Cool tank and a ton of potential regardless of which height you go with. If you go to a 30 inch tall you could put a plenum/DSB in there if you want even though bare bottom is the trend these days. Like Jason says, 4 400 watters perhaps 3 but what's a bit more coin on a tank that size.
Doug |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
The more I read, the more I am leaning towards 96l x 30w x 28h or 26h. It still gives me 325-350 gal. I wanted to go big as possible as this may be my only opportunity to get a large tank.
I will definately start a new thread with pictures as things start to progress. I have to order the industrial racking first. That's going to take 4-6weeks. Well, of course, that's after I pay off my MasterCard (promised my wife!) - Thanks for all your feedback!! Last edited by Norstar; 03-02-2007 at 05:25 AM. |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Ok, new thought.
96l x 34w x 28h - 400 gal. Rather than going higher, I would be going wider. Any drawbacks anybody? |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Some of the best tanks out there have the high front to back measurement. The perspective gives a realism of a reef that you just can't get with a narrow tank.
There's some fantastic deep tanks (front to back) here on Canreef but I often go back to this one http://www.oregonreef.com/sub_aquascaping.htm as an ideal. |