Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 01-30-2007, 04:20 PM
albert_dao albert_dao is offline
Good Guy Albert
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,035
albert_dao will become famous soon enough
Send a message via MSN to albert_dao
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug View Post
Thats why I mentioned above to limit the rock and any thats used should be elevated. We once talked about doing an sps tank with only a couple of pieces of rock, elevated above the plenum on piles {pipe}, and having most of the sps pieces attached to the glass and overflow. Nothing wrong with then having some extra rock in the sump, as long as it can be kept clean.

The limited use of rock in the tank, will also help relieve caclium demand with the coralline. The 4-5in. of gravel will provide more than enough biological filtration.

Of course this limits types of fish, that require lots of hiding places & rock, like many of the smaller fish & dwarf angels, etc. Once the sps grows, more hidey spots are there. I know if I was a fish, this would not be my favorite habitat, at least not at the start.


:P

... I just don't like substrate.

There, I said it. LOL!
__________________
This and that.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-30-2007, 05:32 PM
DJKoop's Avatar
DJKoop DJKoop is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Steinbach, MB
Posts: 53
DJKoop is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to DJKoop
Default

When I was planning on using the plenum way I was going to have a 3" bed using Caribsea Seafloor Special Grade Sand. 1-1.7 mm diameter grain. According to them

"This grade of aragonite is specifically engineered for plenum type nitrate reducing beds.

The pore water space created by precision grading also allows maximum pH support and dissolution of calcium carbonate."
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 01-30-2007, 05:34 PM
DJKoop's Avatar
DJKoop DJKoop is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Steinbach, MB
Posts: 53
DJKoop is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to DJKoop
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug View Post
I would not use the powerhead method myself. Nothing wrong with the riser for allowing the removal of plenum water, {very slowly}, at times. But thats an alternative way and not from the original way Dr. Jaubert published.
The power head was just to get the bed activated. After awhile you remove the power head and the riser.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 01-30-2007, 06:15 PM
albert_dao albert_dao is offline
Good Guy Albert
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,035
albert_dao will become famous soon enough
Send a message via MSN to albert_dao
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DJKoop View Post
When I was planning on using the plenum way I was going to have a 3" bed using Caribsea Seafloor Special Grade Sand. 1-1.7 mm diameter grain. According to them

"This grade of aragonite is specifically engineered for plenum type nitrate reducing beds.

The pore water space created by precision grading also allows maximum pH support and dissolution of calcium carbonate."
Before you make any sort of commitment, I'd ask around on RC and check how many people have long-term success with plenums in a reef tank.

On the other hand, if you're set on plenums, then you're set.
__________________
This and that.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 01-30-2007, 07:31 PM
andsoitgoes's Avatar
andsoitgoes andsoitgoes is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Secret Location
Posts: 433
andsoitgoes is on a distinguished road
Default

Albert - what are your thoughts on reducing a sandbed in an exisiting tank? I know there are spots behind my LR that I'll not be able to get at, but a LARGE portion is in the open and removable. If I was able to get this out each cleaning and left a small amount in the front, just to keep the tank bottom covered - would this be enough to rpevent the problems with a sand bed crash?
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 01-31-2007, 01:52 AM
DJKoop's Avatar
DJKoop DJKoop is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Steinbach, MB
Posts: 53
DJKoop is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to DJKoop
Default

The only reason I have brought up the plenum line of things is Geothermal Aquaculture Research Foundation has lots of tanks and nearly all of them run with the plenum/sand bed and lots are over 5 years old and doing great. They do more research and fraging than anything else. I have found this place to be a great source of info. Fragging videos, and more. It's just that I've never heard of them ever having a problem and the tanks look absolutely amazing. I've never seen tanks stuffed so solid with corals before. And all growing like mad.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 01-31-2007, 02:30 AM
DJKoop's Avatar
DJKoop DJKoop is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Steinbach, MB
Posts: 53
DJKoop is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to DJKoop
Default

Very good reading and full of info, this is the most intersting paragraph

Overall death rates were roughly twice as high in aquaria with shallow sediments as in deep sediment treatments. The highest overall death rates were seen in aquaria with shallow coarse sediments over a plenum, and the lowest death rates occurred in aquaria with a sandbed composed of deep coarse sediments. The treatments that were closest to the design aquarists employ for deep sandbed, Miracle Mud and Jaubert plenum aquaria had intermediate death rates. The shallow coarse sediment design that is closest to that used in Berlin systems had one of the highest death rates, and the deep coarse sediment design for which there is currently no accepted name had the lowest overall mortality (Fig. 10). We did not test bare bottom tanks, but the data clearly suggest that the shallower the sediment, the higher the mortality rate, and you can't get much shallower than a bare bottom tank!
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 01-31-2007, 03:08 AM
BCOrchidGuy BCOrchidGuy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 2,172
BCOrchidGuy is on a distinguished road
Default

WowOwowOwow... Cripes I had just pretty much almost for sure made up my mind for the most part to probably go bare bottom, now I'm kind of wishywashy.

Doug
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 01-31-2007, 03:54 AM
andresont's Avatar
andresont andresont is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Port Moody, BC.
Posts: 594
andresont is on a distinguished road
Default

[quote=DJKoop;233232]Very good reading and full of info, this is the most intersting paragraph

and the deep coarse sediment design for which there is currently no accepted name had the lowest overall mortality (Fig. 10). We did not test bare bottom tanks, but the data clearly suggest that the shallower the sediment, the higher the mortality rate, and you can't get much shallower than a bare bottom tank!
******************
I see it diferently ie, coarse sand will only trap more CR*P and kreate more problems
JM2C worth
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.