Sulfur denitrator experiment

Psyire · #1 12-27-2006, 05:05 AM

Ah.

Well in that case I can't see how your proposed changes could hurt anything. Might want to do one at a time, starting with the cheapest being to slow the flow down 'through' the reactor. Then if that dosen't seem to help, increase the recirculation. That way you don't go the wrong direction twice by accident.

Psyire · #2 12-27-2006, 05:17 AM

Incase you are interested my reactor is going to be an upflow with a eheim 1250 recirculating pump.

I really have a hard time believing a Mag 2 wouldn't be enough for your application. The midwest units use a eheim 1048 which is probably 1/2 the flow of the Mag 2, and their unit is quite big.

Delphinus · #3 12-27-2006, 05:43 AM

One week to cycle ?!

Man ... I feel so ripped off.

Anyhow, I've taken mine offline for now. Will tinker around tomorrow or the next day time permitting .. I agree about the sulfur amounts -- seems to me if it's too small it should just not be able to pull down the tank nitrates as quickly -- but should still cycle and still output zero. At the very least I'm going to swap the pump leads to reverse the flow, and if the recirc pump isn't enough to draw sump water then I'm going to fashion some kind of gravity feed and see how ridiculously slow I can make the flowthrough.

Don't know what to say about the Midwest units using a smaller pump. All I can say is I gave it a month .. and it wasn't cycled so I know something's not right. All I can do is guess at what ... I wish I had more answers.

reeferaddict · #4 12-27-2006, 06:07 AM

Mine is still keeping everything at zero....

Delphinus · #5 12-27-2006, 03:25 PM

I'm so happy for you. And thanks for the plentiful and bountiful suggestions on getting mine to work! You rock!

reeferaddict · #6 12-27-2006, 05:50 PM

Why Tony - I have a whole thread on the matter! In your defense, it seems to be a 50/50 split as to whose works and whose doesn't.

I have about 2 litres of media for close to 200g of system volume with about a 8 - 10 litre per hour of output. A few times mine has clogged as the aragonite dissolves and I have to open up the valve to "flush" the effluent, and I end up with the wonderful rotten egg smell, but other than that it has been pretty much set and forget except for the initial cycling which I wrote about in my thread. One water change of about 10% per month and still zero nitrates - I was pulling my hair out and going through a hundred bucks a month in salt before this little beauty.

In retrospect, considering the time I have been limited to with my system in the past few months, it would be just a green wavy sea of algae by now without this wonderful little gadget!

Delphinus · #7 12-27-2006, 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by reeferaddict

Why Tony - I have a whole thread on the matter! In your defense, it seems to be a 50/50 split as to whose works and whose doesn't.

I know you do, but in all fairness there isn't a lot of info in there for people who want to duplicate a reactor. If I found a Koralin 1502 or whatever then there's maybe enough info. As for nitty-gritty details like whether it's upflow or downflow, pressurized or not, detailed time-based data on the #'s as the unit cycled, and so on .... you neglected to mention those!

So sorry for razzing you but seriously, you were dancing on my misery so I had to give you a hard time about it.

Quote:

In retrospect, considering the time I have been limited to with my system in the past few months, it would be just a green wavy sea of algae by now without this wonderful little gadget!

Would love to be able to duplicate those kinds of results .... well we'll see what trial #2 brings. It's not as easy as "just put some sulfur in it and turn it on and then angels will sing songs in praise of your reef" otherwise I wouldn't be still scratching my head on this one.