Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-04-2002, 08:05 PM
Son Of Skyline's Avatar
Son Of Skyline Son Of Skyline is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 639
Son Of Skyline is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to Son Of Skyline Send a message via MSN to Son Of Skyline
Default RO/DI Units vs DI Only?

Is there a significant benefit to corals and fish in using RO/DI vs a simple DI water filter? I'm trying to see if I can justify the cost of an RO/DI filter vs just keeping my simple DI filter. Will my corals suffer in the long run from not using RO filtration? I haven't had a major algae problem that I can blame on water quality in the 1 year I've been keeping reefs. Thanks in advance
__________________
-Mason
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-04-2002, 09:06 PM
StirCrazy's Avatar
StirCrazy StirCrazy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kamloops, BC
Posts: 7,872
StirCrazy is on a distinguished road
Default

The RO will make your DI last longer... other than that it shopuld be just as good.


Steve
__________________
*everything said above is just my opinion, and may or may not reflect the views of this BBS, its Operators, and its Members. If cornered on any “opinion” I post I will totally deny having ever said this in a Court of Law…Unless I am the right one*

Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-04-2002, 10:49 PM
smokinreefer's Avatar
smokinreefer smokinreefer is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: burnaby,bc,canada
Posts: 1,441
smokinreefer is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to smokinreefer
Default

what are you using now?
a TWP?

if so, i would recommend a ro unit...i just made the switch over and its a cost that you cant really justify until youve paid it. well worth it IMO, wish i had made the investment sooner.

mind you i have a larger need for water than you. i lose 5 gallons of water in 2 days from evaporation alone.
__________________
- S H A O -
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-04-2002, 10:53 PM
Son Of Skyline's Avatar
Son Of Skyline Son Of Skyline is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 639
Son Of Skyline is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to Son Of Skyline Send a message via MSN to Son Of Skyline
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smokinreefer
what are you using now?
a TWP?

if so, i would recommend a ro unit...i just made the switch over and its a cost that you cant really justify until youve paid it. well worth it IMO, wish i had made the investment sooner.

mind you i have a larger need for water than you. i lose 5 gallons of water in 2 days from evaporation alone.

Yes, I'm using the TWP right now. I do have a big need for water as well. I lose about 2gal per day to evaporation. It's just that my budget is tight right now and I can budget in one of two things right now...live rock or an RO/DI unit. The tank is still pretty new and it's only got 35lbs of LR in the 120gal tank. I'm trying to figure what I need first and work on the next item in the next couple months. Thanks
__________________
-Mason
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-04-2002, 11:11 PM
pocilipora pocilipora is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Aldergrove B.C.
Posts: 376
pocilipora is on a distinguished road
Default

I did use the TWP but now I just run the RO without the DI. If you need a unit I can lead you in the right direction. 3 stage plus the RO housing for $60 membranes and filters not included.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-04-2002, 11:26 PM
reefburnaby reefburnaby is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Burnaby, B.C.
Posts: 766
reefburnaby is on a distinguished road
Default

Hi,

TWP is fine as long as you use the top off with kalk. If you are planning to use TWP in water changes...then you'll need to be more careful. TWP is really good with the first 50 gallons of water, but it slowly gets worse. The flow rate through TWP is really critical...slower is better.

RO/DIs are a lot better since the flow rate is controlled by a restricter. ROs are good at removing 90% of the bad stuff and the DI removes the remaining 10%. Its nice to have and saltwaterconnections had a sale on some good units. Since you have a TWP (DI), then all you really need is a RO to make a RO/DI.

- Victor.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-05-2002, 12:03 AM
Son Of Skyline's Avatar
Son Of Skyline Son Of Skyline is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 639
Son Of Skyline is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to Son Of Skyline Send a message via MSN to Son Of Skyline
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pocilipora
I did use the TWP but now I just run the RO without the DI. If you need a unit I can lead you in the right direction. 3 stage plus the RO housing for $60 membranes and filters not included.

Interesting! Email me at sonofskyline@hotmail.com


I have been using the TWP only for the past year for everything, water changes and topoffs. Everything looks ok now but I'm wondering if I'm missing out by not using RO.
__________________
-Mason
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-05-2002, 12:43 AM
smokinreefer's Avatar
smokinreefer smokinreefer is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: burnaby,bc,canada
Posts: 1,441
smokinreefer is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to smokinreefer
Default

oh sorry mason...i forgot you have that 120 in the works...yeah you will eventually want to get an ro...might as well get it now.

even though i dont know the prices of the filters/cartridges...60 bux for the setup sounds like a steal of a deal!!
__________________
- S H A O -
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.