![]() |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I don't have any experience with the biodenitrator but can I do know a little bit about H2S from the job. 10 ppm is the maximum concentration you can be exposed to during an 8 hour work day, so H2S is not a great risk at that level, but with the smell at that level your wife and family may be! 100 ppm will cause watery eyes, respiratory problems and nausea, and 200 ppm gets you close to the death range within hours. Above 500 ppm your life span is minutes and at 700ppm death is almost immediate. It is nasty stuff and kills a few people in the oil industry every year.
As you mention, H2S is detectable at very low levels but is very toxic and will collect in low spots so for me personally it's a piece of equipment that I would only use if the worst case H2S production rate is low, the area is well ventilated to the outside and you can check up on the equipment frequently. |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Ok those numbers are a lot higher than what I thought they were. I was an oilfield worker as a summer student but those days are long behind me so my memory was clouded. I would think 700ppm would be hard to do, even playing with elemental sulfur, i.e., one would notice the smell @1ppm long, long, long before.
__________________
-- Tony My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee! Last edited by Delphinus; 11-13-2006 at 11:32 PM. |
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I agree, and with these things I'm sure you're dealing with pretty low volumes produced. The danger is the accumulation if the tank equipment is in an out of the way place in the basement like mine is.
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() H2S can be smelt in concentrations as low as ppb (parts per billion). It definately is a gas that is not something to laugh about. I happen to work in an oil/gas plant where we have vessels containing 800,000 ppm. (yeah, more than enough to kill a small town off)
That being said, I do not think these reactors have the ability to make it in such high concentrations. Perhaps maybe if it were to go for weeks on end without being noticed. (pump failure) And then you opened it up to atmosphere, but even then I doubt it. Just keep your nose out of it and clean it in the bathroom with a fan on and you'll be fine. Kalk or Carbon dust is probably more harmful to your lungs than the small dose of H2S these would give off. If you are diligent and check your equipment regularly, I don't think there would be a problem. There was one person on a forum who's reactor stoped recirculating and was sending H2S into the tank. His fish developed lesions and his corals didn't look so good. Once disconnecting the reactor things cleared up right away. (I believe he may have lost one fish) So in a sense you should be able to spot the problem before it becomes serious. Just think, his fish didn't just suddenly die, and the LD50 would be super small for fish compared to a human. (body mass) I am on the verge of ordering a unit from Midwest Aquatic... |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Cool. I looked at those and if I wanted to buy a unit I'd probably consider one of those. However I seem to have a collection of unused calcium reactors (I seem to have at least 2 that I'm just sitting on) on top of the one I have in use ATM, so I think I'll just convert one of those for now. I don't see any reason why it wouldn't work. Might need to go to a bigger reactor when I get the 280g going but that's down the road anyhow, and I wouldn't mind DIY'ing something at that point anyhow.
Anyhow good luck with yours. ![]()
__________________
-- Tony My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee! |
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Yeah, I think that is a good bet. If I had a few calcium reactors lying around I'd probably do the same.
I'll post my findings/results in this thread. (if I buy one) |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() My LFS started running a couple of them, and I think it IS a Ca reactor. He's been playing with one, and now runs it with bottom half sulpher, thin foam divider, top half Ca reactor media. There's an ORP probe in the top, and the ORP is controled by the output flow. It's putting Ca into the system, and dropping the Nitrates also. He's super horned up for these things, think's they're the cat's a$$. He says that once the Nitrates are down to 0, the output will be almost fully open, then gets opened all the way so the bacteria don't die, they may diminish, but continue to pull Nitrates as they're produced. AND the unit has an impact on Phosphates also, not huge, but noticeable.
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Pansy-Paws, Where do you get your sulphur media from? Wine shops like posted above? or somewhere else?
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Having used a denitrator with 4 gallons of LSM, I'm not really concerned on the toxic front. For one thing, if this was an issue for this application we would be seeing warning labels up the ying yang, and would have confirmed lawsuits from the US. If that was the case, I doubt that Caribsea and Korallin would still be marketing their products ... too much liability given our litigious nature (ever notice how many warning labels are on ladders these days
![]() I'll definately concede that for industrial settings, this can be serious stuff. However, Delbeek and Sprung devote 7 pages to sulphur denitrification, and only a couple sentence mentions of hydrogen sulfide smell as an issue, mainly around the ambience impact of a smelly living room. The chemical reaction from Holmes-Farley shows: 2 H2O + 5 S + 6 NO3- ---> 3 N2 (gas) + 5 SO42- (sulphate) + 4 H+ (hence slightly acidic effluent and the reason for calcareous material after the sulphur) so no H2S is emitted in the primary reaction, unless the flow is too slow and secondary chemical reactions occur. As you mention Tony, the 1 ppm level will provide ample nasal warning before the level can rise to dangerous levels (which I doubt is even possible ... as this application has been used in Europe for over 10 years on some massive aquariums). Also, with a recircuation system, the volume of sulphur would be much less than even I'm using.
__________________
______________ - Lyle Our tank http://www.pansy-paws.com/aquarium/ 29 gallon nano-tank |