![]() |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
Thanx much,
__________________
Mark. |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Yes the 6100's have to be run of a controller - it is whether you go to a single controller or a multi (up to 4 powerhead) controller. I have only used the multi controller and have never really investigated the single controllers.
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
(I don't mean to get off topic, but I don't get the whole controller thing. ![]() ![]() Thanx much,
__________________
Mark. |
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Oh man now you are going to get me confused
![]() These controller only control the Tunze powerheads and not all that other fancy smantzy stuff. Those controllers I know absolutely nothing about. Here is a link to a 6100 with a single controller. http://www.jlaquatics.com/phpstore/s..._ID=tz-ts6110k |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
So, I took the term “Variable Speed Control” to mean that if this PH (6100) is plugged into the controller, and that controller is programmed, that the PH’s flow rate would fluctuate throughout the day (and night) independent of any further fiddling from the aquarist. Now I’m thinking this assumption is incorrect. Am I now correct to assume that the controller is not programmable, so to speak, and that if I were to want to change the rate of flow of the PH that I would have to adjust the controller each and every time? Also, other than during feeding times....what is the advantage to having the PH turn off? I’m wondering if I can justify the cost of a 6100 PH and a 7091 controller when that combo costs just as much as two 6080’s. Thanx much,
__________________
Mark. Last edited by Johnny Reefer; 09-25-2006 at 04:06 AM. Reason: Math error |
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Calfo manifolds are among the best if you can fit them...
![]() Normally one would use locline to get some nice random flow, but in my case, decided since I had 4 Hydor Flo's kicking around, they'd do just fine (they clip nicely into a 1/2" FPT fitting). |
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
Thanx,
__________________
Mark. |
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
min-->max-->max-->min, or min----->max----->min----->max... or anything in between. This changing in output make more "wavelike" current Last edited by vanreefer; 09-26-2006 at 08:13 PM. |
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() For a totally different perspective.
I use a closed loop that attempts to deliver laminar flow to the entire length of my rock walls. I created the system for seahorses as they don't do well in the focused blast of powerheads. Bear in mind that it is a softie oriented reef and I don't keep SPS. The idea is an adaptation of the UGJ's used in big cichlid tanks. I run 2 M.J. 1000's in line connected to about 16' of 1/2" PVC. This is laid out beneath the substrate along the front and back of my rock walls and drilled every inch with 1/8th holes. When I tested the system I had surface agitation across the entire surface of my tank (straight up from the bottom) and it has worked well so far. The "mini jets" are constantly kicking detritus up into the water column to be siphoned off by the horizontal overflow. I don't run any power heads and the only other flow is moderate surface flow from my returnline. I'll try to post a pic or two. ![]() ![]() and a year later (I am slowly siphoning the substrate out to create a B.B.) ![]() ________ Suzuki RV125 Last edited by Dale; 01-21-2011 at 01:24 PM. |