![]() |
|
View Poll Results: If skimmers didn't exist, which would be your next choice? | |||
Wet/Dry (trickle) filter |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
12 | 8.51% |
Fluidized bed filter |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 3.55% |
UV sterilizer |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
9 | 6.38% |
Mechanical filter |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 7.09% |
Live rock/sand bed (exclusively) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
75 | 53.19% |
Carbon filter |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
14 | 9.93% |
Other |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
16 | 11.35% |
Voters: 141. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
Yes Bev, but how much extra work has not having a skimmer cost you? mind you I think you have a little bit of Obsessive/compulsive going on anyways with your water changes and tank maintenance so it probably works for you, but for normal people who don't want there tanks to consume there whole life..... ![]() Sorry Bob, I can't back you on this one.. I tried your "skimmer-less" ideal for the last 6 months as I figured what the heck I am building a new one anyways.. anyhow.. algae ran out of control, water changes went from 10% a month to about 50% a week personal maintenance went to a daily thing instead of every month.. sorry I don't have the time to not run a skimmer. to replace a skimmer you need more than just 1 thing up there for example a Skimmer will: remove dissolved organics = Carbon remove undissolved stuff = mechanical filter remove nitrates by removing the stuff that causes them in the first place = mechanical filter + live rock/sand bed/fluidized filter OK now you still have other benefits that you will be missing.. a all in one solution, aeration of the water with out air stones or excessive surface movement which leads to salt creep, extra water flow.. ect.. for what it is worth there are ways to stop a skimmer from putting bubbles into a tank so that should never be an issue. and sense a skimmer is basically a closed loop there is no reasons for floods if you use some common sense and chose your skimmer and set up with what you want to achieve in mind. Steve
__________________
![]() Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive. Last edited by StirCrazy; 03-19-2006 at 04:15 PM. |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Steve,
FWIW, quoted from http://www.nimh.nih.gov/HealthInformation/ocdmenu.cfm .... Quote:
Anyway, on to other matters..... What good does a monthly 10% water change do for your tank? Why even bother with water changes at all when they are so infrequent and small? I know a guy at the lfs who boasts he hasn't done a water change in three years and has shown me pics on the web to prove his corals' health. You've got all the gadgets and know how to pull off something like this. Why not do what he does? For that matter, what good does a measly weekly 15% water change do for my tanks? It certainly does not raise my alk, Ca or Mg, and if I had nitrate/phosphate issues, 15% a week wouldn't even begin to address them. I've read that doing frequent water changes replenishes trace elements, but I have no way of testing to know if that's true. I've also read that doing frequent water changes adds heavy metals from the salt mix into the tank, which, over time, can be unhealthy for a tank's inhabitants. Again, I have no real way to test this either. I think the real issue at hand is that comparing my tank and my maintenance regime to your tank and your maintenance regime is comparing apples to oranges. You have chosen one way to keep a reef and I have chosen another. IMO, what works for each of us, if indeed our maintenance regimes are doing what we claim they do, should be good enough. Cheers to all reefers! Last edited by Beverly; 03-20-2006 at 03:45 PM. |
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Just wanted to comment on finicky skimmers, micro bubbles and floods.
1. For hang-on skimmers, you unfortunately have a small risk here, but mitigate it by using high quality designs like Remoras and this should not be a problem. For in-sump skimmers, proper sump design will eliminate micro bubbles. You need to allow enough space for the bubbles to rise and pop, baffles help as well. 2. For floods because of a skimmer overflowing, just drill the collection cup high up and emptly it into a 5g bucket for it to overflow into. 3. Some skimmers do require lots of tuning for initial setup. But I think this setup time is less than the time required to maintain a non-skimmer setup. If you have to keep tuning your skimmer, then something keeps changing in your reef, likely inconsistant water level, and dosing your tank with different products. Bev's skimmerless tanks work for her and that is great. She does have very nice tanks, they are beautiful and really quiet which is nice. But she has trade-offs too. She keeps her bioload really low, does tons of tank maintenance and runs bare bottom. So a reefer has to figure out if they are willing to make this trade-off or not. I know I am not, I like high bioloads and the look of a sand bottom and try to keep maintenance to a minimum. For the bulk of reefers, and especially those just getting into the hobby I think a skimmer is essential. |
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Rory,
Thanks for the compliments ![]() Low bioload is only one reason I keep fewer fish than most people. The other, and probably more important reason, is to not be a heavy consumer of wild fish populations. I've talked at length about this consumer issue on other recent threads, one of which is the LFS debate. |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() You're welcome, you deserve it, your obviously care for and care about your reefs a great deal.
|