Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-07-2006, 02:56 PM
TheReefGeek's Avatar
TheReefGeek TheReefGeek is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 1,503
TheReefGeek is on a distinguished road
Default

According to this site, the XM 20K has higher PPFD than the 15K, check near the bottom of the page, there is a comparison chart.

http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2005/6/aafeature2/view


I am also surprised that the name brand ballasts seem to get lower PPFD on average, than the "standard" magnetic M59 type ballast (not sure what brand "standard" is though!)
__________________
Rory

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-07-2006, 09:18 PM
Invigor's Avatar
Invigor Invigor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Regina
Posts: 905
Invigor is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheReefGeek
I am also surprised that the name brand ballasts seem to get lower PPFD on average, than the "standard" magnetic M59 type ballast (not sure what brand "standard" is though!)
electronic ballasts aren't known for high performance, but for economy. Also, XM designs their bulbs to run best on probe start ballasts -- hence the better numbers on the standard magnetic ballasts. It proves that XM did a good job fine tuning the bulb for probe start ballasts.
__________________
a tout le monde, a tous les amis.
je vous aime, je dois partir.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.