|
|
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: If skimmers didn't exist, which would be your next choice? | |||
| Wet/Dry (trickle) filter |
   
|
12 | 8.51% |
| Fluidized bed filter |
  
|
5 | 3.55% |
| UV sterilizer |
  
|
9 | 6.38% |
| Mechanical filter |
  
|
10 | 7.09% |
| Live rock/sand bed (exclusively) |
  
|
75 | 53.19% |
| Carbon filter |
  
|
14 | 9.93% |
| Other |
|
16 | 11.35% |
| Voters: 141. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
03-03-2006, 02:28 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
reply
Sorry dude, I haven't had the time at work to read that novel!
__________________
THE BARQUARIUM: 55 gallon cube - 50 lbs LR - ASM G3 skimmer - 30 Gallon sump - 22 Gallon refugium / frag tank - 4x 24 watt HO T5's - Mag 9.5 return - Pin Point PH monitor - 400 watt XM 20K MH in Lumenarc reflector - Dual stage GFO/NO3 media reactor - 6 stage RODI auto top up -Wavemaster Pro running 3 Koralia 2's. Fully stocked with fish, corals and usually some fine scotch http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=55041 
|
|
#2
03-03-2006, 03:20 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Haha touche. Well, the coles notes version is that one of the modifications that I made was to put a submersible light inside the cannister filter.
- Chad
__________________
Returning to the hobby after an eight year absence.
|
Hybrid Mode
