Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Polls

View Poll Results: If skimmers didn't exist, which would be your next choice?
Wet/Dry (trickle) filter 12 8.51%
Fluidized bed filter 5 3.55%
UV sterilizer 9 6.38%
Mechanical filter 10 7.09%
Live rock/sand bed (exclusively) 75 53.19%
Carbon filter 14 9.93%
Other 16 11.35%
Voters: 141. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 02-23-2006, 09:02 PM
danny zubot's Avatar
danny zubot danny zubot is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Castlegar BC
Posts: 3,469
danny zubot is on a distinguished road
Default reply

Bob, if you've never had one then how can you possibly decide if they are "grossly overated" Have you seen skimmate?
__________________
THE BARQUARIUM:
55 gallon cube - 50 lbs LR - ASM G3 skimmer - 30 Gallon sump - 22 Gallon refugium / frag tank - 4x 24 watt HO T5's - Mag 9.5 return - Pin Point PH monitor - 400 watt XM 20K MH in Lumenarc reflector - Dual stage GFO/NO3 media reactor - 6 stage RODI auto top up -Wavemaster Pro running 3 Koralia 2's.

Fully stocked with fish, corals and usually some fine scotch
http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=55041
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-23-2006, 09:15 PM
Bob I's Avatar
Bob I Bob I is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 3,591
Bob I is on a distinguished road
Default

It would of course be an exercise in futility to engage in an argument. I have stated an opinion, and that is as far as I will go. I have run a very successful reef tank for the last five years without resorting to a skimmer except a brief unsatisfying experience with one, and my decision is to leave the gadget to those who believe there is need for one.
__________________
Bob
-----------------------------------------------------
To be loved you have to be nice to people every day - To be hated you don't have to do squat.

---------Homer Simpson--------
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 02-23-2006, 09:22 PM
TheReefGeek's Avatar
TheReefGeek TheReefGeek is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 1,503
TheReefGeek is on a distinguished road
Default

Yes, it is possible to run a successfull reef without a skimmer, nobody will argue that.

But could that same reef be run easier, and possibly even healthier, with a skimmer?

Bob, what skimmer did you try, on what size tank? What made the experience unsatisfying?
__________________
Rory

Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 02-23-2006, 10:11 PM
Beverly's Avatar
Beverly Beverly is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Edmonton
Posts: 3,560
Beverly is on a distinguished road
Default

I'm with boB on this one.

A few years ago, we ran a Precision Marine HOT skimmer on our first two reefs for about 2-3 years. Produced great skimmate! But fiddling with it to remove micro bubbles, fiddling to get the skimmate not too wet or too dry, and coming home to at least two floods was just too much freaking work! Now that we live in a second storey condo, floods are a major no-no

I know we do exta work to compensate for the lack of skimmers on our three reefs, but we don't have any more floods and don't have to fiddle with extra machinery. IMO, our reefs look great.

Rory and countless others have seen our skimmerless reefs. Anyone care to comment on how our reefs are doing without skimmers?
__________________
Beverly
~~~~~

Beverly's 10g Nano YouTube Channel

Last edited by Beverly; 02-23-2006 at 10:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 02-23-2006, 11:01 PM
Psyire's Avatar
Psyire Psyire is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern Alberta
Posts: 605
Psyire is on a distinguished road
Default

I think you can run a tank just fine without a skimmer. However once you get into the bigger tanks a skimmer is almost a necessity, due to the amount of time and money required to due major upkeep all the time. My total system volume nears 250 gallons and I would not like changing 10-20% of this every week. If I was retired and didn't have much on the go, well I could manage that, but I'm not. I perfer doing less waterchanges and pulling oodles of junk out with my skimmer. I also think that the balance in my tank is better due to the fact that I'm always pulling out waste that is theoretically introduced as food everyday. It dosen't accumulate until my next water change.

Bev gets away with not skimming, but she's also on a very strict maintenance schedule that some people would have a hard time adhereing to.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 02-23-2006, 11:15 PM
Bob I's Avatar
Bob I Bob I is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 3,591
Bob I is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheReefGeek
Yes, it is possible to run a successfull reef without a skimmer, nobody will argue that.

But could that same reef be run easier, and possibly even healthier, with a skimmer?
If that same reef is my reef, the answer is emphatically NO

Quote:
Bob, what skimmer did you try, on what size tank? What made the experience unsatisfying?
It must be remembered that I have been keeping salt water tanks off and on since the middle seventies. I have probably tried every gadget that was foisted upon the unwary hobbyist. And my findings are that the skimmer is just an overrated gadget.
__________________
Bob
-----------------------------------------------------
To be loved you have to be nice to people every day - To be hated you don't have to do squat.

---------Homer Simpson--------
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 02-23-2006, 11:37 PM
Quagmire's Avatar
Quagmire Quagmire is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Calgary
Posts: 588
Quagmire is on a distinguished road
Default

Fuge and 10-15% weekly water changes on the tank without the skimmer....wait a minute ... same routine for the tank with the skimmer.
__________________
No matter how hard you try, you can't baptise cats.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 02-23-2006, 11:50 PM
TheReefGeek's Avatar
TheReefGeek TheReefGeek is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 1,503
TheReefGeek is on a distinguished road
Default

Bob, I cannot possibly "remember" that you have been keeping SW tanks since the 70's, I wasn't even born!

What size tank(s) are you currently running skimmerless? Any more details on your tanks? Cleaning regiment, fuge, etc?
__________________
Rory


Last edited by TheReefGeek; 02-24-2006 at 12:01 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 02-23-2006, 11:59 PM
Aquattro's Avatar
Aquattro Aquattro is offline
Just a guy..
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 18,053
Aquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the rough
Default

One thing to keep in mind is what "reef" means to you. I keep primarily SPS, and feel that a skimmer is essential. If I instead kept a tank with zoos and/or softies only, I would have to seriously consider not using a skimmer. I have seen tanks of this type that appear to do better with higher nutrient levels.
We certainly can't argue with Bob about skimmers, he's been not using one for ever and his tanks all do just fine. I use a skimmer and my tank does just fine. So who's right? Both of us. Or neither, depending on how you look at it.

To address the topic, if skimmers didn't exist, I'd use ozone, GAC and water changes. And I'd invent skimmers and get rich!!
__________________
Brad
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 02-24-2006, 12:10 AM
Psyire's Avatar
Psyire Psyire is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern Alberta
Posts: 605
Psyire is on a distinguished road
Default

The problem with ozone is that the best way to run it is with a skimmer. From what I've read those ozone reactors aren't all that great.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.