![]() |
|
View Poll Results: If skimmers didn't exist, which would be your next choice? | |||
Wet/Dry (trickle) filter |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
12 | 8.51% |
Fluidized bed filter |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 3.55% |
UV sterilizer |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
9 | 6.38% |
Mechanical filter |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 7.09% |
Live rock/sand bed (exclusively) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
75 | 53.19% |
Carbon filter |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
14 | 9.93% |
Other |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
16 | 11.35% |
Voters: 141. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Bob, if you've never had one then how can you possibly decide if they are "grossly overated" Have you seen skimmate?
__________________
THE BARQUARIUM: 55 gallon cube - 50 lbs LR - ASM G3 skimmer - 30 Gallon sump - 22 Gallon refugium / frag tank - 4x 24 watt HO T5's - Mag 9.5 return - Pin Point PH monitor - 400 watt XM 20K MH in Lumenarc reflector - Dual stage GFO/NO3 media reactor - 6 stage RODI auto top up -Wavemaster Pro running 3 Koralia 2's. Fully stocked with fish, corals and usually some fine scotch http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=55041 |
#22
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() It would of course be an exercise in futility to engage in an argument. I have stated an opinion, and that is as far as I will go. I have run a very successful reef tank for the last five years without resorting to a skimmer except a brief unsatisfying experience with one, and my decision is to leave the gadget to those who believe there is need for one.
![]()
__________________
Bob ----------------------------------------------------- To be loved you have to be nice to people every day - To be hated you don't have to do squat. ---------Homer Simpson-------- |
#23
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Yes, it is possible to run a successfull reef without a skimmer, nobody will argue that.
But could that same reef be run easier, and possibly even healthier, with a skimmer? Bob, what skimmer did you try, on what size tank? What made the experience unsatisfying? |
#24
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I'm with boB on this one.
A few years ago, we ran a Precision Marine HOT skimmer on our first two reefs for about 2-3 years. Produced great skimmate! But fiddling with it to remove micro bubbles, fiddling to get the skimmate not too wet or too dry, and coming home to at least two floods was just too much freaking work! Now that we live in a second storey condo, floods are a major no-no ![]() I know we do exta work to compensate for the lack of skimmers on our three reefs, but we don't have any more floods and don't have to fiddle with extra machinery. IMO, our reefs look great. Rory and countless others have seen our skimmerless reefs. Anyone care to comment on how our reefs are doing without skimmers? Last edited by Beverly; 02-23-2006 at 10:13 PM. |
#25
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I think you can run a tank just fine without a skimmer. However once you get into the bigger tanks a skimmer is almost a necessity, due to the amount of time and money required to due major upkeep all the time. My total system volume nears 250 gallons and I would not like changing 10-20% of this every week. If I was retired and didn't have much on the go, well I could manage that, but I'm not. I perfer doing less waterchanges and pulling oodles of junk out with my skimmer. I also think that the balance in my tank is better due to the fact that I'm always pulling out waste that is theoretically introduced as food everyday. It dosen't accumulate until my next water change.
Bev gets away with not skimming, but she's also on a very strict maintenance schedule that some people would have a hard time adhereing to. |
#26
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Bob ----------------------------------------------------- To be loved you have to be nice to people every day - To be hated you don't have to do squat. ---------Homer Simpson-------- |
#27
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Fuge and 10-15% weekly water changes on the tank without the skimmer....wait a minute ... same routine for the tank with the skimmer.
__________________
No matter how hard you try, you can't baptise cats. |
#28
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Bob, I cannot possibly "remember" that you have been keeping SW tanks since the 70's, I wasn't even born!
![]() What size tank(s) are you currently running skimmerless? Any more details on your tanks? Cleaning regiment, fuge, etc? Last edited by TheReefGeek; 02-24-2006 at 12:01 AM. |
#29
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() One thing to keep in mind is what "reef" means to you. I keep primarily SPS, and feel that a skimmer is essential. If I instead kept a tank with zoos and/or softies only, I would have to seriously consider not using a skimmer. I have seen tanks of this type that appear to do better with higher nutrient levels.
We certainly can't argue with Bob about skimmers, he's been not using one for ever and his tanks all do just fine. I use a skimmer and my tank does just fine. So who's right? Both of us. Or neither, depending on how you look at it. To address the topic, if skimmers didn't exist, I'd use ozone, GAC and water changes. And I'd invent skimmers and get rich!!
__________________
Brad |
#30
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() The problem with ozone is that the best way to run it is with a skimmer. From what I've read those ozone reactors aren't all that great.
|