|
|
|
|
|
#1
12-23-2005, 01:45 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Let's not compare the two, let's instead direct attention towards the fact that the Seaclone is, without a doubt, one of the worse entry level skimmers on the market.
An RC search (try 2 AM, I find the server pretty dead around then, Ha!) should be more than enough to back up what I'm saying.
__________________
This and that. Last edited by albert_dao; 12-23-2005 at 01:47 AM. 
|
|
#2
01-30-2006, 09:55 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Just another point, theres a reason they are nick-named Seaclowns, lol.
__________________
No more tanks  - Laying off the ReefCrack for awhile!Cheers, Chris
|
|
#3
01-30-2006, 10:34 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
I have a seaclown..lol..100 and it can pull a cup a week of "coffey"colored skimmate...run a 20 gal...I think iworks fine ,but I've also never tried the AquaC Remora...I did buy a AquaC ev-120 though for my next system if that helps....
|
|
#4
02-01-2006, 05:22 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Give the Remora some time to break in to your system, I bet in a few weeks you will notice a difference. If you dont, then you probably do not have a very high bioload, and could probably support more inhabitants with the Remora. When I ran a remora pro it was a great skimmer.
|
|
#5
02-03-2006, 03:44 AM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
I used to have a seaclone.But I found it very finicky always adjusting the air either too much or not enough then finally I got ****ed off and got rid of it.I use a prism now.And YES it is working and does good.I havent tried the aqua rmora though.Keep us posted.
george
__________________
Its all about the fishies.
|
Hybrid Mode
