Bert's Back - Page 2

blood_hound · #11 08-10-2005, 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by muck

Quote:

Originally Posted by blood_hound

You cannot just punch someone and claim its not intentional. You can only do that if your fist has a mind of its own

your a edited or a kid

no need for personal attacks blood_hound..

Ok that is not personal attack to aznufo.. I am just explaning that a person cannot punch someone and claim its not intentional.. Yes its a bad choice for word. I'll edit it. But I stand by my word...

adidas · #12 08-10-2005, 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vanreefer

he already had 17 months.... asbout 20 time as long as he would have had for the same assault off the ice

are you counting the lockout season towards his suspension? no one played last year.

he only missed 14 regular season games, and 7 playoff games, a whopping 21 games...wow...

rickjames · #13 08-10-2005, 05:02 PM

This is bound to be a heated topic... so I won't even comment on it

So guys.... how about those acanthastreas?

adidas · #14 08-10-2005, 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rickjames

This is bound to be a heated topic... so I won't even comment on it

So guys.... how about those acanthastreas?

don't wanna touch this one eh..

rickjames · #15 08-10-2005, 06:55 PM

Not with a 10 foot pole!

Edmonton Eskimo · #16 08-12-2005, 01:34 AM

I have always found it funny how only vancouver fans stick up for this guy. It doesn't matter what his intentions were the fact is that his actions caused a broken neck and Steve Moore(let's not forget about him) will probably never play hockey again and realistically bertuzzi shouldn't be able to play until moore can. I'll put it this way what if that was Georges Laraque who did that and it was against a vancouver player you would call for his head. I'm not saying anything against vancouver fans but Bertuzzi is a moron and 20 games is not enough for ending someones career. Period!

Manny · #17 08-12-2005, 02:19 AM

Did they actually prove that it was Bertuzzi's punch that broke his neck or the three players from his own team jumping on top of him after? It is a real shame that Moore got a broken neck, but that stuff is bound to happen in a game like hockey. What i find unfair is how that NHL "reacts" and dose not "act". Do you think that Bert would have got the same suspention if Moore did not get his neck broken. Hitting from behind happens all the time. Why is o.k. sometimes and not others. Do you think Bert wanted Moores neck to be broken, of course he was sorry about that.

its over and done. lets play hockey.

GO CANUCKS GO

P.S. It was pretty pathetic watching Bert cry like a little kid in front of millions of people.

SJSobczyk · #18 08-12-2005, 02:24 AM

Quote:

Did they actually prove that it was Bertuzzi's punch that broke his neck or the three players from his own team jumping on top of him after?

Can a neck be broken while laying flat on the ice? Doesnt add up!

Anyways its looking to be a great season in the West. Looking forward to another season of the Flames in the finals and the red mile!

Steve

AJ_77 · #19 08-12-2005, 05:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edmonton Eskimo

I have always found it funny how only vancouver fans stick up for this guy.

You're right - I read some letters in the Globe and Mail from various parts of the country, and they were quite heated against reinstating him before 2006.

Maybe most of them were Leafs fans... but I doubt it. I hate seeing replays of that incident - you just can't explain it away no-how.