|
|
|
#11
04-05-2005, 03:03 AM
|
|||||
|
|||||
Hey,
I would go with the 400 watters. Im running a 400W(10K) over my 33. BRIGHT BRIGHT BRIGHT! Lol. Make sure to put your 400W close enough to the 250 so that it doesnt look like the center of your tank is darker. BTW: Go with TAR ballast. Cheaper than PULSE.(Well at J&L anyways) Chris
__________________
No more tanks  - Laying off the ReefCrack for awhile!Cheers, Chris 
|
|
#12
04-05-2005, 04:32 AM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
 Steve
__________________
 *everything said above is just my opinion, and may or may not reflect the views of this BBS, its Operators, and its Members. If cornered on any “opinion” I post I will totally deny having ever said this in a Court of Law…Unless I am the right one*Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive.
|
|
#13
04-05-2005, 06:16 AM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Brad
|
|
#14
04-06-2005, 02:54 AM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
I have been reading lots of posts on reef central, both XM and Ushio 10K are reported to run very well on the 400W HQI (aka. son agro). Some guys are running them over a year, unlike the Radiums, with no noticeable change in coral growth or bulb colour. I bought my ballasts from the local hydophonics shop on the weekend, 100$ each, they are made by advanced I think. I still haven't decided which bulbs to run, either the Ushio or the XM's. Probably the XM's though, they have the highest PAR value for a 400W SE bulb and a colour of 13000K in Sanjay's tests. Plus they are 30$ cheaper 
__________________
Brennan
|
Linear Mode
