![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() yes it was another salifert test and the results are higher across the board with Cal,kH and Mg.
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Why not try lowering your alk dose....
I test my alk with Hanna vs salifert and the difference can be about .4-7 on the salifert. But let's say if your alk is at 8 and your dosing 220 ml per day and it's rising why not first try to adjust your doser 6 points belowso 210ml or 214ml per day and see if it stabilizes out. I think salifert is abit higher readings than the Hanna but this could only be for me...
__________________
Always looking for the next best coral... 90g starphire cube/400mhRadium20k/2 XHO/2x27w UV/2x39w T5/ 3 Trulumen led strips |
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I am by far and away no expert, however I have run a 500 gallon system and if that has taught me anything it's that huge volume system perams are a lot like stopping a fully loaded freighter.........it's a long and painful process. If I were a gambling man I would hedge my bets on testing. I would also stash the salifert kits for back up testing Alk and PO4 and run Hanna. I keep test kits of each on hand just in case as a back up test to check reagent and the likes if I get odd readings, but unless you have a veritable forest of SPS your perams should not swing that badly. Calcium and Mag won't swing too terribly far unless you have the forest of SPS either.
That and you would benefit immensely from a reactor with a system that big. Good luck
__________________
Cheers Gary 604-319-0317 |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|