Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-17-2017, 04:00 PM
Galizio's Avatar
Galizio Galizio is offline
The Don
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Surrey
Posts: 244
Galizio is on a distinguished road
Default

I use 2 part doser, really like it , is simple and need very little adjustment, is costing more to run then a calcium reactor imo in the long run... just to clarify I use balling method ... my tank is only 105g. I think if in the future going for a bigger thank then I'll consider a calcium reactor , just because the cost to run 2 part dosing on a bigger tank can climb up fast


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-17-2017, 06:06 PM
tang daddy's Avatar
tang daddy tang daddy is offline
Likes to play with Fish
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,482
tang daddy is on a distinguished road
Default

Any pics of the sps dying? Top to bottom or bottom up?
__________________
Always looking for the next best coral...

90g starphire cube/400mhRadium20k/2 XHO/2x27w UV/2x39w T5/ 3 Trulumen led strips
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-17-2017, 08:48 PM
Bblinks's Avatar
Bblinks Bblinks is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Coquitlam B.C.
Posts: 3,033
Bblinks is on a distinguished road
Default

Larger systems, calcium reactor.
smaller systems, 2-3 part dosing is more efficient.

I personally prefer calcium reactor due to the trace elements you are adding along with the major elements.
__________________
Though a tree grow ever so high, the falling leaves return to the root.

300DD - 140DD



TOTM Fall 2013
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.