PO4 test kits - Hanna VS Salifert

[Delphinus]

If you get consistent readings with the Hanna checker using the 3 minute timer as you describe then I'd feel fairly confident in its numbers. Assuming of course you have newish reagents - if memory serves there was a time period that there were bad batches of reagents (fairly easy to confirm if you had one of the bad batches - just do 2 tests in a row and see if the #'s match well enough or not).

Not sure how this applies to Salifert's PO4 test kit but I noticed that with the Mg test kit (which is a titration based test kit rather than a colour comparison, so this might be an apples-to-oranges comparison) that the reagents would expire and then you wouldn't get good readings anymore. So if the test kit is more than say a year old, I'd consider replacing it.

If in doubt though, I think repeatability is the real pathway to figuring out which is the more trustworthy result, if you know someone who has a third test kit that you could ask for a test, see if you can get a value that corroborates one for you over the other..

[GoFish]

Well this is slightly embarrassing. I just checked the Salifert PO4 kit and it expired in 08.16... could swear I checked all 4 boxes before Boxing Day And they were all good from 2018-2020 but for some reason had 2 Alk kits together and the PO4 was on a different shelf

Anyway, pointless technical thread question with an expired kit

However I may have an isssue...
Just did 2 back to back tests with the Hanna and got 125ppb (.38ppm) and then 114ppb (.35ppm). Might be more inaccurate than it's suppose to be. Instructions say within ±5 ppb ±5% of reading. It was 23ppb (.07) last night! Will need to do some research into this. The Salifert still shows much lower (but it's expired, interesting to know anyways)