Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #12  
Old 01-17-2004, 04:32 PM
IslandReefer IslandReefer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Victoria, B.C.
Posts: 278
IslandReefer is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dyereefer
Is this true? If it is I will be ****ed I am no electrical engineer but if this is the case why would they advertise it the way they do.?
..Sorry dude..a lot of the vho vs. no seems to be true. I think its funny even Icecap admits this(...as STEVE says,heres some ref. from Icecap:
http://www.icecapinc.com/rev1.htm
http://www.icecapinc.com/rev2.htm
Seems that 660's are better at making NO hotter (brighter but shorter lived) than their stated use as a VHO E-ballast. But @ $2.50 to $5.00 for No (GE @ C.T. or the 6500k daylight delux @ Home depot) I can blast a lot of tubes before it costs as much as VHO bulbs.

Does anyone know if the Work Horse ballast overdrives NO also....a difference in wiring??...
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.