Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board

Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board (http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/index.php)
-   Reef (http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   Icecap 660..NO or VHO? (http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=7545)

Son Of Skyline 01-16-2004 04:31 PM

Icecap 660..NO or VHO?
 
For anybody using an Icecap 660 for actinics, have u noticed an actual difference between using NO tubes vs VHO? I've only used NO on the 660 and I know they're overdriven, but are they overdriven to VHO levels?

StirCrazy 01-16-2004 04:37 PM

Re: Icecap 660..NO or VHO?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Son Of Skyline
For anybody using an Icecap 660 for actinics, have u noticed an actual difference between using NO tubes vs VHO? I've only used NO on the 660 and I know they're overdriven, but are they overdriven to VHO levels?

nope, a icecap over drives NOs to HO levels and under drives VHO to HO levels.

Steve

Son Of Skyline 01-16-2004 04:43 PM

Re: Icecap 660..NO or VHO?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by StirCrazy
nope, a icecap over drives NOs to HO levels and under drives VHO to HO levels.


Interesting. Thanks Steve.

Werbo 01-16-2004 06:22 PM

How about a Fulham WorkHorse 7 ballast?
Is it consider a HO or VHO ballast for 2X48 inch bulbs

ree-fready 01-16-2004 08:01 PM

Re: Icecap 660..NO or VHO?
 
[quote="Son Of Skyline"]
Quote:

Originally Posted by StirCrazy
nope, a icecap over drives NOs to HO levels and under drives VHO to HO levels.

how come they only drive a vho bulb to ho levels? is this not a vho ballast?

ron101 01-16-2004 10:24 PM

Quote:

how come they only drive a vho bulb to ho levels? is this not a vho ballast?
It has to do with the Icecap circuitry. I believe it runs them at lower wattage but slightly higher frequency.

Quote:

How about a Fulham WorkHorse 7 ballast?
Is it consider a HO or VHO ballast for 2X48 inch bulbs
If you wire them in parallel (as in the manual), a WH7 will power 2-48" tubes to HO level. Wiring them in series (like one 8' tube) might run at close to full VHO level as a WH7 can run 2-96W PCs, though I have never done this.

StirCrazy 01-16-2004 10:29 PM

the icecap is actualy a electronic ballast like the workhorse but the prewiring done by IceCao sets it up to be a electronic HO ballast.

a work horse 7 can drive NO, HO or VHO depending how you set it up.

Steve

canadawest 01-17-2004 07:08 AM

Re: Icecap 660..NO or VHO?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by StirCrazy
Quote:

Originally Posted by Son Of Skyline
For anybody using an Icecap 660 for actinics, have u noticed an actual difference between using NO tubes vs VHO? I've only used NO on the 660 and I know they're overdriven, but are they overdriven to VHO levels?

nope, a icecap over drives NOs to HO levels and under drives VHO to HO levels.

Steve

I am currently using an Icecap 660 to drive 4 x 48" lamps.

So if that theory (or fact as it may be) holds true, it really is a waste of money to spend $34 per URI 110W VHO actinic bulb when an $18 Phillips 40W NO actinic bulb will produce nearly the same output?

(Pricing based on 48" florescent tubes as of Jan 17th, 2004 online J&L's website)

If so, I'm gonna save myself some money when it's time to change lamps!

PS.. I'm already using GE Ultra-Daylight NO 40W lamps from Crappy Tire in place of URI 110W VHO Aquasuns ($4.25 vs $41.95) Hell I can change them 4 times a year and still save over 50% over the URI VHOs. :cool:

dyereefer 01-17-2004 07:15 AM

Is this true? If it is I will be ****ed I am no electrical engineer but if this is the case why would they advertise it the way they do.?

golden69_ca 01-17-2004 09:31 AM

insteed of getting new bulb got to albright lighting in coquitlam of the mary hill bypass and get a work horse 7 balast and drive the vho properly . last time i checked they sell to the public also and i think the price on one is around 65 buck . why whould anyone not got to vho over no or ho ? :biggrin:


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.