Quote:
|
Originally Posted by StirCrazy
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Son Of Skyline
For anybody using an Icecap 660 for actinics, have u noticed an actual difference between using NO tubes vs VHO? I've only used NO on the 660 and I know they're overdriven, but are they overdriven to VHO levels?
|
nope, a icecap over drives NOs to HO levels and under drives VHO to HO levels.
Steve |
I am currently using an Icecap 660 to drive 4 x 48" lamps.
So if that theory (or fact as it may be) holds true, it really is a waste of money to spend $34 per URI 110W VHO actinic bulb when an $18 Phillips 40W NO actinic bulb will produce nearly the same output?
(Pricing based on 48" florescent tubes as of Jan 17th, 2004 online J&L's website)
If so, I'm gonna save myself some money when it's time to change lamps!
PS.. I'm already using GE Ultra-Daylight NO 40W lamps from Crappy Tire in place of URI 110W VHO Aquasuns ($4.25 vs $41.95) Hell I can change them 4 times a year and still save over 50% over the URI VHOs.
01-17-2004, 07:08 AM
Re: Icecap 660..NO or VHO?
Hybrid Mode
