![]() |
|
Portal | PhotoPost Gallery | Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() No a sandbed would get in the way.
After you feed your frogfish, live baby fish Scott Michaels says they make large piles of sh*t which is easy to remove. A BB would be better as you would see it easier I would think. I havn't kept them though and wouldn't. The idea of throwing in a live baby fish and watching the frogfish attack it is not appealing to me. |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() it all depends on a few factors.
first off bare bottom would be way easier to clean which is a plus. but you have to consider how much rock you are putting in the tank when you are dealing with frogfish. the reason being if you are doing lots of rock then bare bottom is fine because the frogfish can just hide in all the rock and be perfectly camoflouged. but if you are not doing alot of rock i would suggest a sandbed as it makes the frogfish feel more comfortable. in my frogfish tank i just have one small island in the middle and then big clumps of amcro algae growing everywhere. what ive noticed is the frogfish likes to try to camofloughe by going to the edge of a rock, digging himself into the sand a little bit and then huddling next to the rock so that he looks just like the rock. just my 2 cents |
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I do want a lot of rock for him so I will leave it BB for now. I can always add sand later if I think he needs or would like it.
The frogfish I'm getting my friend has had for over a year, he puts small damsels with it and feeds pellets to the tank. My friend said he's never seen him eat, but every now and then a damsel goes missing ![]() ![]()
__________________
One more fish should be ok?, right!!! ![]() |
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
Sems like the ethical thing to do, right! |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() why would you want to euthanize the frogfish, it's a great species and not a common thing.
If he wanted to get rid of it then find another reefer willing to keep it. Having the frogfish eat the damsels for food is a much better use of... the food chain than just killing the frogfish and throwing it away... but this starts going into ethics. to each their own. I have no problems with the food chain and one animal eating another. |
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Just so you know I really want the frogfish and am looking forward to getting it. Also I've had too many devil damsels to value their lives over that of a frogfish.
However I don't like the idea of the frogfish eating damsels but on the other hand that is kinda how the food chain works and really is it that much different then me eating steak or pork? No not really, the only difference is I didn't kill the animal myself, however that doesn't stop me from eating it. That being said of course I'm going to try my hardest to get the frogfish eating frozen and not live. I figure if I can fill him up on frozen then hopefully he'll leave the damsels alone. I'm bringing him home tonight so we'll see what happens.
__________________
One more fish should be ok?, right!!! ![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|