![]() |
|
Portal | PhotoPost Gallery | Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() hey, I was just reading a consumer report mag today.. apple is 2nd behind toshiba in laptops, and third behind two dells in desktops..
![]() Steve
__________________
![]() Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive. |
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Hmm. All the same discussions as when I was in high school 13 years ago... back when 'Apple is about to die, blah blah blah...' Of course, in those days, Apple produced a far more stable and ostensibly superior product. I agree that in those days, the system overall was more stable than a comparable PC... I had nothing but headaches with Windows in those days. Even XP has given me problems, though I have had few (if any) issues that I've heard of others having with Vista. Even so, I'm planning on upgrading to 7, because it will speed things up (gotta love that 64 bit code).
Can anyone tell I'm sort of a tech-geek? Okay, back to Apple. They're still around, and indeed gaining market share (and profits are definitely up). My next computer purchase will be a 21 inch iMac, and I'll be loading W7 onto it. I like having that sort of access, and now Windows is almost Mac-like. Almost... and it will extend the life of my current Dell laptop. Not about to toss something that still works. Note that there are still Macs in use from the 90's. How often do you see a PC from the 90's? Remember those $2K IBM Aptivas? Well, $2K PowerMacs from the time are still serviceable, I know of at least one person that has a 9600 from the late 90's that processes video. Oh, and FYI, Apple did license out to 'clones'... some notable names that come to mind are Power Computing (who produced the fastest Mac of the day), and Motorola (shouldn't surprise anyone, they were producing the Mac processors of the day). In the end it hurt the bottom line pretty bad (hardware sales dropped precipitously) so it only lasted for about 3 or so years, from what I can remember. |
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Wow and I felt lame initially telling people I had a macBook Pro. That is a mouthful of silly!
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
![]() Cue yor best Jeremy Clarkson voice shouting "POOOWEERRRRR!!!!" |
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
And really, all computers have silly name... when people ask me what I have, I say I have a mid-range Dell laptop that works okay for games. I should chime in on the Apple Google Xerox HTC thing also... Eventually, this is going to work itself out just like back in the day when Microsoft went for Apple's jugular, and Apple fought back. Stuff like this between tech companies happens, it's just the way it goes (and hopefully, we the consumer eventually benefit). Let's just all try to remember that we are the consumers... spend your cash wisely. And we'll see if iPad doesn't go the way of Newton. Hope Apple has another use for those newly developed (really?) A4 processors.
__________________
Calvin --- Planning a 29 gallon mixed reef... Last edited by BlueAbyss; 03-10-2010 at 05:54 AM. |
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
Here's an interesting perspective on Apple vs. the critics: http://www.theweek.com/article/index..._first_reviews |
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() For the Ipad
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQnT0zp8Ya4 Apple's marketing is second to none, period. I think that's where Apple's true genius is. Even in the article you posted Ron, it's tough to disagree with some of the critics. I'll use the iPhone as an example. The first ones were a great idea but poorly implemented. My friend had an original iphone and my $50 LG had a camera while his multi-hundred dollar Iphone didn't his reception was terrible (mine still is). Apple lover's would call it an idea that came before it's time, I'd call it an unpolished product released before it was properly thought out. I've got the 3GS and absolutely love it, and while it's definately an improvement over the previous models, they are not revolutionary leaps forward every time. Imac's are another good example. They are a nice computer, with a nice user interface. BUT they are no more reliable, or better performing then my PC running windows 7. Apple can charge a premium because 1) they focus their marketing against legacy windows systems like 98SE, 2000, NT, and XP. and 2) Even I'll admit that the whole package LOOKS really sexy sitting on a desk. Since the Ipad is featuring in this discussion, and I don't mean to pick on you exclusively Ron, but you like to talk about all the things that the Ipad COULD be and you paint a very pretty picture, it would be nice if the Ipad WAS all those things, but I'm still left with the fact that it ISN'T any of those things you think it MIGHT be one day. And it's not really about hating Apple or their products, it's the constant rhetoric, negative and misleading advertising that I'm tired of. |
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
What I was referring to is exactly that, the possibility that the public won't 'get' the product and it will be pushed aside by the marketplace. I think the iPad might be a winner... though if I personally bought one, I'd have to buy a keyboard to go with it.
__________________
Calvin --- Planning a 29 gallon mixed reef... |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|