![]() |
|
||||||||
| Portal | PhotoPost Gallery | Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
![]() It would have to go where the tank sticks out into the living room and that side of the tank has no LR really or anything. Its a open sandy area. It would be quite noticeable I thought that since I have powerheads anyways, maybe it wouldn't be a big deal but I measured and its big for that space. At least with the powerheads, they can stay just closer to the surface and are not as noticeable. The tank is quite shallow, so the wave box will look even bigger. The regular one will look massive in that side of the tank. I just think it maybe defeats the purpose of having a peninsula tank with a box on the end. I think in the end, a closed loop would have been the way to go. The tank is actually drilled for one and the intake is just capped but it would be a big deal I think to plumb it with the tank already full Too risky for me anyways since the intake is on the bottom of the tank. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I hate it when you're faced with the possibility of a tank being emptied, and consequently, a tank redo that always seems to spring from it.
It sounds like you really want to do the closed loop... sux that it might not be the most practical though. |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
which is not an option. The closed loop would have been probably the cheapest way to go too! Maybe for now I will just find a cheaper solution to adding more flow until I figure things out. I don't really want to spend $600-700 plus on a wavebox or two and then find out I hate how they look. I would go with two Vortechs but man...$1000 plus taxes? I don't think its worth that. I do need to up the flow in the tank somehow until I figure out what to do. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
you could construct some boxes out of some cheap, water resistant material to tunze spec and just see if it doesn't drive you crazy before you go buy the real thing....
maybe worth the little hassle to be certain. I just meant the most practical for the flow you're looking for, not to actually do. |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
My fiance has already said she thinks it will "kill the look of the tank" and that I better not spend $600 on something that looks so bad Probably should walk away from the idea at this point |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
just my 2 cents... |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
I also just realized that since it is a closed loop, I could actually plumb the whole thing and then just uncap the intake and allow water to drain...there is nowhere for the water to go since its a closed loop ![]() |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
hahahaha...
Gotta love it when a plan comes together....lol |
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
So for those of you using the Vortech MP40, do you think it can get a similar effect (wave) as the wavebox on a 6' tank?
|
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
I love my vortech, I just picked up a second one today. standard 90G 4' tank. I'm playing with it for wave action but I cannot get them to make a decent wave. I just need some practice I think I have seem them make insane waves in videos.
__________________
- Greg 90G : Light - Tek 6xT5 | Skim - EuroReef RS135 | Flow - 2xVortech MP40W | Control - Reef Keeper 2 Last edited by digital-audiophile; 01-19-2009 at 02:31 AM. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|