Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-16-2009, 05:15 AM
Mrfish55's Avatar
Mrfish55 Mrfish55 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Powell River
Posts: 669
Mrfish55 is on a distinguished road
Default

The intensity and duration of the wave is adjustable, on a 6' tank you can actually achieve a double wave which would probably work better with your overflow, I think the nano would be too small, if you go with the wavebox in a tank that size go with the full size unit. It wont matter which end you mount it on, you may be able to mount it to your overflow to help blend it in also.

Last edited by Mrfish55; 01-16-2009 at 05:17 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-16-2009, 05:17 AM
GreenSpottedPuffer's Avatar
GreenSpottedPuffer GreenSpottedPuffer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,337
GreenSpottedPuffer is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrfish55 View Post
The intensity and duration of the wave is adjustable, on a 6' tank you can actually achieve a double wave which would probably work better with your overflow, I think the nano would be too small, if you go with the wavebox in a tank that size go with the full size unit.
What would the nano do though? For sure it would still reach the other end but I guess maybe already have dissipated/slowed too much? I thought that may be good since the overflow would be less effected. The problem then though is that most of my corals are down at that end

I like the idea of the double wave with the larger unit too.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-16-2009, 05:25 AM
Mrfish55's Avatar
Mrfish55 Mrfish55 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Powell River
Posts: 669
Mrfish55 is on a distinguished road
Default

Perhaps you could borrow a unit from a fellow reefer to try it out before shelling out the $ to see if you like. I have had one on my tank for the last three years and am happy with it, I have dual corner overflows and the noise is not that bad as the waves are pretty constant so it kind of finds a rythm.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-16-2009, 05:48 AM
GreenSpottedPuffer's Avatar
GreenSpottedPuffer GreenSpottedPuffer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,337
GreenSpottedPuffer is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrfish55 View Post
Perhaps you could borrow a unit from a fellow reefer to try it out before shelling out the $ to see if you like. I have had one on my tank for the last three years and am happy with it, I have dual corner overflows and the noise is not that bad as the waves are pretty constant so it kind of finds a rythm.
Yeah that would be great but I doubt I can find someone who wants to come over with a wavebox

I am pretty sure I want one over the vortech but I would really love to use the smaller one (cheaper and smaller). Only problem is whether its worth it with less flow. I doubt it now though. Sounds like the regular size one is the way to go.

I guess the bigger one would take up more room but would also create most of the flow for my tank.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-16-2009, 06:17 AM
fkshiu's Avatar
fkshiu fkshiu is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,499
fkshiu is on a distinguished road
Default

I doubt the nano would work very well with a 6' tank. You could ask Roger Vitko to be sure.

I actually run a Wavebox with an external Herbie overflow on the opposite end. After much experimentation I found that the best way to keep the overflow silent is to have the overflow filled to the top of the emergency drain with just a trickle of water going down the emergency drain. If the water level is any lower the waves that the wavebox creates makes a lot of noise as they constantly wash over the edge and down into the overflow.

Tunze actually recommends a center overflow with a wavebox to minimize the effect of the waves on the draining action of the overflow.

If you were to go with the vortech, it would look even uglier than the wavebox if you had to put it on the exposed end of the tank because of the wires hanging on the OUTSIDE of the tank.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-16-2009, 06:57 AM
GreenSpottedPuffer's Avatar
GreenSpottedPuffer GreenSpottedPuffer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,337
GreenSpottedPuffer is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fkshiu View Post
I doubt the nano would work very well with a 6' tank. You could ask Roger Vitko to be sure.

I actually run a Wavebox with an external Herbie overflow on the opposite end. After much experimentation I found that the best way to keep the overflow silent is to have the overflow filled to the top of the emergency drain with just a trickle of water going down the emergency drain. If the water level is any lower the waves that the wavebox creates makes a lot of noise as they constantly wash over the edge and down into the overflow.

Tunze actually recommends a center overflow with a wavebox to minimize the effect of the waves on the draining action of the overflow.

If you were to go with the vortech, it would look even uglier than the wavebox if you had to put it on the exposed end of the tank because of the wires hanging on the OUTSIDE of the tank.
Yes thats my problem with the Vortech. I actually DON"T want the wires outside the tank! But I can have the cord go up to my canopy instead of down. Still not going to look too good though.

I think either way its going to look bad but the wavebox will be a bit easier on the eyes and also give better flow. Right now I have two ugly powerheads on that side of the tank anyways!

Sounds like I would have to go with the regular wavebox. I just though I may be able to get away with the smaller one since the tank is so shallow.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-16-2009, 07:19 AM
GreenSpottedPuffer's Avatar
GreenSpottedPuffer GreenSpottedPuffer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,337
GreenSpottedPuffer is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Yeah the guys in the Tunze forum over at RC are saying it would not preform right on a 6' tank. So either the regular size one or the Vortech. Hmmmm....
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-16-2009, 04:02 PM
Whatigot Whatigot is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Coquitlam, B.C.
Posts: 680
Whatigot is on a distinguished road
Default

any chance you could run a nano and then a second nano inline?

MY nano rocks my 48' 72 gallon.
I'm getting a 95 (48X18X24) this weekend and don't expect it to do any less of a fantastic job...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.