|
|
|
||||||||
| Portal | PhotoPost Gallery | Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| View Poll Results: Which categories are you interested in for the nano contest #2? | |||
| stock 5.5 limited budget |
   
|
6 | 13.04% |
| stock 5.5 unlimited budget |
  
|
2 | 4.35% |
| stock 10 limited budget |
  
|
16 | 34.78% |
| stock 10 unlimited budget |
  
|
2 | 4.35% |
| custom limited budget |
  
|
27 | 58.70% |
| custom unlimited budget |
  
|
10 | 21.74% |
| other (please post) |
|
7 | 15.22% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 46. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#17
04-21-2009, 06:19 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
...okay, see now this is why i think a max budget with no max volume would be a good idea. I don't think anyone in their right mind would try to seriously win this thing while budgeting for a tank over 20g or so anyways; certainly not over 30g, and that's pushing it. It also doesn't technically exclude anyone from entering the contest... so no ruffled feathers. It also allows any sized sump one could want... just have to budget for it. personally my definition of a nano only includes the display, not the sump (unless it is used for display purposes); stability of a system is just a fail safe and if some one wants to incorporate that into a nano, i say kudos; nanos shouldn't have to be unstable. shrug, jmo.
Last edited by justinl; 04-21-2009 at 06:23 PM. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Threaded Mode
