Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Product Review and Equipment Forum > Filtration and Skimmer Specific

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-15-2011, 03:05 AM
Palmer's Avatar
Palmer Palmer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary SW
Posts: 362
Palmer is on a distinguished road
Default Skimmer article/study

http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2010/1/aafeature

This has probably already been posted as it is from 2010 but I thought it was interesting.

Last edited by Palmer; 04-15-2011 at 03:10 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-15-2011, 04:56 PM
badAZZlars badAZZlars is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 230
badAZZlars is on a distinguished road
Default

Wow that is a highly technical read, reminded me of university.

Makes me happy that I only spent $300 on my bubble magus 180cs instead of spending over $1000 on a comparable bubble king.

It also confirmed to me the importance of regular water changes as none of the skimmers were able to remove more than 35% of the organics from the water.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-15-2011, 07:14 PM
Palmer's Avatar
Palmer Palmer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary SW
Posts: 362
Palmer is on a distinguished road
Default

If you liked that one there is another article in the same publication in the following March issue that breaks down skimmate to look at what it is comprised of. That one was pretty neat too.

I agree water changes seem to be the main necessity. It's funny because I find protein skimmers to be one of the fun toys of going to the salt aspect of the hobby but in some ways when looking at articles like this it makes me believe that they capture a big slice of the hobby investment because aquarists like to buy shiny toys that have pumps and make bubbles. lol....
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-15-2011, 08:31 PM
Madreefer's Avatar
Madreefer Madreefer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Prince George
Posts: 2,064
Madreefer is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by badAZZlars View Post

Makes me happy that I only spent $300 on my bubble magus 180cs instead of spending over $1000 on a comparable bubble king.
Well it kinda ****es me off knowing that I spent $1000 more than I should have. Twice!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-15-2011, 09:14 PM
ALang ALang is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sherwood Park, Alberta
Posts: 614
ALang is on a distinguished road
Default

Thank Goodness!
I saved for months and bought a Bubble Magnus NAC-7 and call myself lucky that I didn't spend even more!!
For years I ran my 130 gallon heavily stocked tank with my Remora Pro!
But I did do frequent water changes, though.
Lenny.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-15-2011, 09:24 PM
sphelps's Avatar
sphelps sphelps is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lyalta, East of Calgary
Posts: 4,777
sphelps is on a distinguished road
Default

There's not much to a skimmer so yeah most models are pretty comparable in performance, this should not be news to most people. The difference between less and more expensive models is quality, consistency, reliability and efficiency. For instance a cheaper skimmer may require constant adjustment and maintenance to keep it working properly, it may also be louder and use more power. Reliability has also come into play many times in the past, I purchased the ATI when it came out thinking it was the bomb, worked great, was quiet, efficient and half the price of the competition yet it only lasted a few months before the pumps started acting up. Not saying that even the most expensive skimmers don't have the occasional issue but having a reliable company and warranty behind it helps a lot.

So as always purchase a skimmer in your budget but you still do get what you pay for.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-15-2011, 11:19 PM
Palmer's Avatar
Palmer Palmer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary SW
Posts: 362
Palmer is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sphelps View Post
There's not much to a skimmer so yeah most models are pretty comparable in performance, this should not be news to most people. The difference between less and more expensive models is quality, consistency, reliability and efficiency. For instance a cheaper skimmer may require constant adjustment and maintenance to keep it working properly, it may also be louder and use more power. Reliability has also come into play many times in the past, I purchased the ATI when it came out thinking it was the bomb, worked great, was quiet, efficient and half the price of the competition yet it only lasted a few months before the pumps started acting up. Not saying that even the most expensive skimmers don't have the occasional issue but having a reliable company and warranty behind it helps a lot.

So as always purchase a skimmer in your budget but you still do get what you pay for.

That is a good point. I do not think they looked at quality of construction etc. Although that is all still based on the premise that it is good to have one and if it is then all the stuff you mentioned I also think are important factors. I think oxygenation is another benefit (although you could just set up a waterfall or powerhead to do this) and it does still pull stuff out of the water whether it is as much as we like or not. I dont plan on going skimmerless....

P
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-15-2011, 09:23 PM
mike31154's Avatar
mike31154 mike31154 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vernon
Posts: 2,073
mike31154 will become famous soon enough
Default

My eyes glazed over after the first couple of sentences with all the formulae & math. I usually skip right to the summary/conclusion of stuff like that. I'm still using an old school counter current wooden air diffuser skimmer that came with my used system when I initially got into the hobby. Did a couple of minor mods to make it work a tad better & easier to adjust, build my own monster wooden air diffusers out of Basswood & Gorilla Glue. The skimmer is very quiet, low power consumption and works fine, pulls some good dry gunk out of the system. Looking at the funky scrapings I take out of it from time to time, I can't imagine running a system without one, even if the article says the best you can get is 35% of the organics. Tried a Remora C HOB with mag 3 pump for a few months and hated that thing. Noisiest piece of gear ever to come near my system and never produced anything other than a mild tea. Unable to get the type of goo as with my old skimmer, so I was real happy to switch back. Both of these skimmers came with used tanks that I purchased, so in a way they didn't cost anything. I ended up giving the Remora away after cracking the inlet tube.
__________________
Mike
77g sumpless SW
DIY 10 watt multi-chip LED build http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=82206
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.