Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Product Review and Equipment Forum > Filtration and Skimmer Specific

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-26-2010, 12:23 AM
deputy1234 deputy1234 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: London, Ontaio
Posts: 32
deputy1234 is on a distinguished road
Default

Thanks TJSlayer,

I left the valve fully open and I going to leave opened for a few days. Sofar everything is going well. Also, thank you for this posting the review, if it wasn't for you I wouldn't know about the skimmer.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-26-2010, 02:02 AM
TJSlayer's Avatar
TJSlayer TJSlayer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Regina
Posts: 206
TJSlayer is on a distinguished road
Default

No problem at all!

I wouldn't worry too much about fine tuning it for a few days, doesn't seem to take long to break in though....
__________________
75G, 100 lbs LR, Inwatter Stingray LED's, 25 Gallon Sump, 24wt UV, hermits, Snails, pep, fire & cleaner shrimps, Blue Throat Trigger, Perc Clowns , Yellow Tang, Coral Beauty, Blue Regal tang, RBTA, Coral Banded Shrimp, Checkerboard Wrasse, Many Corals, Royal Tux Urchin
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-02-2010, 04:16 AM
TJSlayer's Avatar
TJSlayer TJSlayer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Regina
Posts: 206
TJSlayer is on a distinguished road
Default Re: NEW SWC Extreme 160 Cone review

Yeah 7-8" seems to be about the sweet spot, otherwise skims really wet
__________________
75G, 100 lbs LR, Inwatter Stingray LED's, 25 Gallon Sump, 24wt UV, hermits, Snails, pep, fire & cleaner shrimps, Blue Throat Trigger, Perc Clowns , Yellow Tang, Coral Beauty, Blue Regal tang, RBTA, Coral Banded Shrimp, Checkerboard Wrasse, Many Corals, Royal Tux Urchin
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-02-2010, 04:52 AM
deputy1234 deputy1234 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: London, Ontaio
Posts: 32
deputy1234 is on a distinguished road
Default

I'm thinking I should lower my water level to 8" from 9"
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-05-2010, 01:35 AM
TJSlayer's Avatar
TJSlayer TJSlayer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Regina
Posts: 206
TJSlayer is on a distinguished road
Default Re: NEW SWC Extreme 160 Cone review

Wouldn't hurt to try it, you will probably find it easier to adjust.
__________________
75G, 100 lbs LR, Inwatter Stingray LED's, 25 Gallon Sump, 24wt UV, hermits, Snails, pep, fire & cleaner shrimps, Blue Throat Trigger, Perc Clowns , Yellow Tang, Coral Beauty, Blue Regal tang, RBTA, Coral Banded Shrimp, Checkerboard Wrasse, Many Corals, Royal Tux Urchin
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-05-2010, 03:55 AM
Skimmerking's Avatar
Skimmerking Skimmerking is offline
acanthastrea freak
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Virden, Manitoba
Posts: 5,690
Skimmerking is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to Skimmerking Send a message via MSN to Skimmerking
Default

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm and I only live like 2 hours away when I pick up my Tank i may have to pick up a skimmer to .. nice review. slayer
__________________
180 starfire front, LPS, millipora
Doesn't matter how much you have been reading until you take the plunge.
You don't know as much as you think.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-05-2010, 02:11 PM
TJSlayer's Avatar
TJSlayer TJSlayer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Regina
Posts: 206
TJSlayer is on a distinguished road
Default Re: NEW SWC Extreme 160 Cone review

I thought you had a really nice skimmer? Or are you looking for something smaller?
__________________
75G, 100 lbs LR, Inwatter Stingray LED's, 25 Gallon Sump, 24wt UV, hermits, Snails, pep, fire & cleaner shrimps, Blue Throat Trigger, Perc Clowns , Yellow Tang, Coral Beauty, Blue Regal tang, RBTA, Coral Banded Shrimp, Checkerboard Wrasse, Many Corals, Royal Tux Urchin
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-05-2010, 03:07 PM
dreef's Avatar
dreef dreef is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sask.
Posts: 347
dreef is on a distinguished road
Default

Mike has a beast of a skimmer Todd,but he's never happy...he's a tester for the worlds skimmer companies.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-10-2010, 01:10 AM
freezetyle's Avatar
freezetyle freezetyle is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Victoria
Posts: 802
freezetyle is on a distinguished road
Default

I should probably be posting this in the general forum but i am torn between getting the cone 120 and the 160. Its for a 50 gallon total water volume, but i like the idea of being able to just swap over the skimmer for when a big upgrade happens and its only about $50 more. From the amount of skimmate you guys are pulling out it seems the 160 will be over kill. any suggestions.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-10-2010, 04:04 PM
deputy1234 deputy1234 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: London, Ontaio
Posts: 32
deputy1234 is on a distinguished road
Default

It maybe a little over kill but if you are thinking of upgrading in the future the 160 would work just fine in you're tank. You may not pull the same amount as others but the skimmer will work great. My current setup is 55gallon tank with a 20gallon sump and heavily stocked. My total water volume is approximately 60gallon and the skimmer performs well.

Last edited by deputy1234; 04-10-2010 at 05:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.