![]() |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
Here are a few pics taken with 100mm macro ![]() ![]() and a few pics taken with the kit lens. ![]() ![]() |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() To heck with the lens, where can someone buy white balance
![]()
__________________
Brad |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() have both canon 100 and a sigma, the sigma is a good choice to save some bucks (I think it was about a 400 or so difference between my two).
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() So what kind of a lens would you need to take close ups like that of corals that are near the back of say a 24" tank?
__________________
![]() |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Brad |
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
the lens i use for all my macro shots is the sigma 150mm f2.8 which is a $1000+ lens. With the new canon 100mm f2.8 "L" lens out the older 100mm f2.8 non L is a steal for performance you can generally find them at roughly $400-500 |
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() im gonna have to say 100mm f2.8 and get wireless speedlight triggers.
here are some of my shots with that lens ![]() ![]() ![]() |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I don't even know what words to use to describe these photos. I do sports, equine photography as a side hobby-I seriously need to learn from you.
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() hey adam, i would suggest any of the sigma lens series, there sharp as canon and have a much longer warranty, canon's is a one year whereas most of sigma's are ten years! unless your really into wasting a bunch more money simply for the name then i would stick with sigma or a used canon, canon's L series lenses are worth every penny however unless your a pro or serious amateur i wouldn't spend the extra. or if your on a really tight budget you could try the kenko close up extension tube, you just won't get the quality and sharpness of a true macro lens.
__________________
cheers, Rich all that we do is touched with ocean, yet we remain on the shore of what we know http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2005/5/aquarium |