Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > Other > Lounge

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 01-23-2009, 03:35 AM
StirCrazy's Avatar
StirCrazy StirCrazy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kamloops, BC
Posts: 7,872
StirCrazy is on a distinguished road
Default

I am going to agree with the water ballast theory, this is how 99% of the evasive species have been transfered around the world, and the reason why there are sevear regulations about how and where you can ballast or deballast your ships now.

Steve
__________________
*everything said above is just my opinion, and may or may not reflect the views of this BBS, its Operators, and its Members. If cornered on any “opinion” I post I will totally deny having ever said this in a Court of Law…Unless I am the right one*

Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-23-2009, 04:12 AM
justinl's Avatar
justinl justinl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,245
justinl is on a distinguished road
Default

well first of all, where did you get 99% from? US EPA states "Over two-thirds of recent non-native species introductions in marine and coastal areas are likely due to ship-borne vectors, and ballast water transport and discharge is the most universal and ubiquitous of these". I do agree that this is a severe problem and is far from addressed despite ballast fill/discharge regulations.

lions associate with reefs and i have a hard time seeing ports sustaining a good enough environment to sustain a them. so i remain dubious concerning the lions-by-ballast theory. im much more inclined to blame it on ignorance of well meaning people... actions with the best intentions applied carelessly can often lead to the most devastating results. and "i didn't know" isn't a good enough excuse to me.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-23-2009, 07:25 AM
J.Lloy J.Lloy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Spruce Grove
Posts: 155
J.Lloy is on a distinguished road
Default

Just wondering, do ships even fill ballasts near any reefs. I would think the lionfish count in a harbour would be real low. I'd vote Aquarists.
__________________
Jared
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-26-2009, 02:22 AM
StirCrazy's Avatar
StirCrazy StirCrazy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kamloops, BC
Posts: 7,872
StirCrazy is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by justinl View Post
well first of all, where did you get 99% from? US EPA states "Over two-thirds of recent non-native species introductions in marine and coastal areas are likely due to ship-borne vectors, and ballast water transport and discharge is the most universal and ubiquitous of these". I do agree that this is a severe problem and is far from addressed despite ballast fill/discharge regulations.

lions associate with reefs and i have a hard time seeing ports sustaining a good enough environment to sustain a them. so i remain dubious concerning the lions-by-ballast theory. im much more inclined to blame it on ignorance of well meaning people... actions with the best intentions applied carelessly can often lead to the most devastating results. and "i didn't know" isn't a good enough excuse to me.
the 99 was a number out of my head, just meant a high amount.

Lion fish are around reefs, yes, but also around man made structures that substitute as artificial reefs, so in theory they could suck up all kinds of fish around old established jetties in the tropics.
__________________
*everything said above is just my opinion, and may or may not reflect the views of this BBS, its Operators, and its Members. If cornered on any “opinion” I post I will totally deny having ever said this in a Court of Law…Unless I am the right one*

Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.