Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 01-08-2003, 09:37 PM
Bob I's Avatar
Bob I Bob I is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 3,591
Bob I is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
I was think of taking out two of my 2x OD NOs and replacing them with 4 - 55 watt bulbs.
That sounds like an excellent plan. The reason being is that I have been having some unconfirmed misgivings about that overdriving business. Originally I believe the whole idea called for ELECTRONIC ballasts. Most of the ballasts I saw used here were at best Hybrids. IOW they were just tar ballasts with SOME electronic components like a capacitor to provide starting kick. I may be wrong, but I suspect you were not getting the amount of light you thought you were getting. At least any of the setups I saw were not as bright as I expected.
__________________
Bob
-----------------------------------------------------
To be loved you have to be nice to people every day - To be hated you don't have to do squat.

---------Homer Simpson--------
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-08-2003, 11:53 PM
rossb rossb is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Calgary, N.W.
Posts: 295
rossb is on a distinguished road
Default

ouch...this is going to hurt...turning on my brain

Quote:
Isn't "Watts" (or more rather "power") just current, times voltage? Or some such.
This is correct. I had a long explanation of the differneces between rapid start, instant start and program start..but after consideration..and not wanting to bore everyone to death I think it is likely as simple as the type of bulb you expect to power with them ... T12 versus T8.

I recently discovered first hand the T8's need more power to start and to operate than the T12's

IMO.
__________________
take pictures, leave footprints
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-09-2003, 12:08 AM
Delphinus's Avatar
Delphinus Delphinus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Posts: 12,896
Delphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via MSN to Delphinus
Default

Really. Wow, and I thought the push for T8 was all supposed to be "green" and less energy consumption and all that. Or is it just that the T8's have less Mercury or something then (which of course would be a good reason)
__________________
-- Tony
My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-09-2003, 12:11 AM
StirCrazy's Avatar
StirCrazy StirCrazy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kamloops, BC
Posts: 7,872
StirCrazy is on a distinguished road
Default

the bigest thing is a 32 watt T8 has the same light out put as a 40 watt T12.

so they are saving you 8 watts


Steve
__________________
*everything said above is just my opinion, and may or may not reflect the views of this BBS, its Operators, and its Members. If cornered on any “opinion” I post I will totally deny having ever said this in a Court of Law…Unless I am the right one*

Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-09-2003, 03:39 AM
Tau2301's Avatar
Tau2301 Tau2301 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Calgary, S.W.
Posts: 364
Tau2301 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally I believe the whole idea called for ELECTRONIC ballasts. Most of the ballasts I saw used here were at best Hybrids.
I had questioned the quality of the ballasts purchased at Home Depot. They did not seem to give off the same amount of light that my Advance ballasts did.

I have the Advance REL-4P32-SC that Burnabyreefer had said to use in his original thread on overdriving. I believe these are true electronic ballasts. I am running both T12 and T8 bulbs, but not mixing them on the same ballast.

I am currently (not a pun) running at 2X so I have 2 bulbs per ballast. So by removing one ballast and two bulbs I figure I could add one Workhorse 7 and 4 55W CFL in their place.
__________________
bye for now, Kim.
=================
for every vision...
there is an equal and opposite revision.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-09-2003, 04:22 AM
AJ_77's Avatar
AJ_77 AJ_77 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary NW
Posts: 2,772
AJ_77 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tau2301
So by removing one ballast and two bulbs I figure I could add one Workhorse 7 and 4 55W CFL in their place.
If you could get a quote on the GE 9325K 55W PC bulbs, I would be interested in that, Kim. I believe the UPC is 043 168458511, at a case quantity of 6. Maybe the price will be right.
__________________
----------------------
Alan
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-09-2003, 02:30 PM
rossb rossb is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Calgary, N.W.
Posts: 295
rossb is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
I recently discovered first hand the T8's need more power to start and to operate than the T12's
Don't listen to this guy

I meant to say the T8's need more power to start than the T12's but less power to operate.

In searching though I did find this interesting tidbit.
http://www.americanfluorescent.com/page12.html
Note the little chart down the page a bit..the aprox input watts. If you are using the lamp wattage to calculate your power bill you will be quite a bit off.

A missing piece in this discussion (power = current*voltage*PF) is the power factor. The power factor is the lag is the phase between currrent and voltage and is usually arround .9 and it applies to all ballasts.

Also of interest is this comparison of the lumens per watt of the various CF/fluorescent incandesent lights
http://www.americanfluorescent.com/page11.html
__________________
take pictures, leave footprints
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-09-2003, 06:02 PM
ron101's Avatar
ron101 ron101 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: North Vancouver, BC
Posts: 262
ron101 is on a distinguished road
Default

Here's some more questions for ya:

I'm looking to OD my 2-4ft NO's but my fixture has a remote ballast. I see that Fulham makes a Longhorse model for remove duty but they are not a regularly stocked item nor will the larger ballast fit in my current case.

So are any of you using a Workhorse remotely? If so what sort of run length?

Secondly, what would be good choice to OD the 2-4 footers? Workhorse 5, 6, or 7?

TIA
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-09-2003, 08:22 PM
Bob I's Avatar
Bob I Bob I is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 3,591
Bob I is on a distinguished road
Default

[quote="Tau2301"]
Quote:
Originally I believe the whole idea called for ELECTRONIC ballasts. Most of the ballasts I saw used here were at best Hybrids.
Quote:
I have the Advance REL-4P32-SC that Burnabyreefer had said to use in his original thread on overdriving. I believe these are true electronic ballasts.
That sounds right. As I said those Hometown ballasts were not the right thing to use, and I am sure the light output was no better than hooking them up normally.
__________________
Bob
-----------------------------------------------------
To be loved you have to be nice to people every day - To be hated you don't have to do squat.

---------Homer Simpson--------
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-09-2003, 08:59 PM
Canadian Man's Avatar
Canadian Man Canadian Man is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 2,550
Canadian Man is on a distinguished road
Default

[quote="rcipema"]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tau2301
Quote:
Originally I believe the whole idea called for ELECTRONIC ballasts. Most of the ballasts I saw used here were at best Hybrids.
Quote:
I have the Advance REL-4P32-SC that Burnabyreefer had said to use in his original thread on overdriving. I believe these are true electronic ballasts.
That sounds right. As I said those Hometown ballasts were not the right thing to use, and I am sure the light output was no better than hooking them up normally.
Sorry Bob, I think your incorrect. I hooked one up OD and had 4 at NO going beside it and you could see an obvious diffrence in the light output of the bulb
__________________
No matter what the morrow brings, inventors keep inventing things.
-----------------------------------
Jonathan
-----------------------------------
www.cakerybakery.ca
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.