Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

View Poll Results: 120 or 135 gallon
120 gallon 6 75.00%
135 gallon 2 25.00%
Voters: 8. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-31-2002, 01:56 AM
Aquattro's Avatar
Aquattro Aquattro is offline
Just a guy..
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 18,053
Aquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the rough
Default

I think one foot matters a lot to bigger fish. I've had triggers and they loved swimming the length of the tank. If it's fish only, the right tank would be the longer one. Maybe the owner has to get more creative in rockscaping, but the fish would prefer the length.
__________________
Brad
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-31-2002, 03:15 AM
EmilyB's Avatar
EmilyB EmilyB is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Scenic Acres NW Calgary
Posts: 4,253
EmilyB is on a distinguished road
Default

Having a 120g with lots of fish including tangs and a trigger, I'd go the 24" width regardless As Tony said, you can do an awesome rock structure in the middle (thank you Jon ) with swim-thrus, and the fish can swim around, over, under.

Just my own personal observations, and comparing to the fish swimming the extra two feet in my larger tank without this "width" option as much.

If you decide to go reef later, the lighting will be cheaper as well....
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-31-2002, 05:22 AM
Dresden Dresden is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Maple Ridge
Posts: 206
Dresden is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to Dresden
Default

It seems i will be going with the 120g regardless. After much discussion with the 135 gallon owner, his demensions for the tank seems to have matched my friend kris's tank at 105g. It seems he had his messurements down wrong and it is actually a 105 gallon.
Thanx for all your help I will keep you posted on the result of the tank.

120 g

42"x24"x30"
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-31-2002, 05:33 AM
Acro Acro is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Abbotsford
Posts: 495
Acro is on a distinguished road
Default

FYI

L X W X H / 231 = Gal.

Which makes the 120 a 130 and your 55 a 41
and now the 135's only a 105.
__________________
Jamie Cross
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-31-2002, 05:57 AM
Dresden Dresden is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Maple Ridge
Posts: 206
Dresden is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to Dresden
Default

hmm thats a good for the new tank then

bad for my current tank

so in the end
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-31-2002, 11:26 PM
Troy F's Avatar
Troy F Troy F is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Surrey, B.C.
Posts: 1,158
Troy F is on a distinguished road
Default

Jamie = coral guru and mathematical genius!

I like the wider tank myself but my opinion for any of the bigger fish would be to go with a 6' tank if possible. I chose a 5'x24.5"x24.5" tank and according to the formula; my 155gal tank is a 155.90909090909gal tank :shock: (why couldn't they just add that extra eensy bit to make a 156 ) , if I could do it over (mulligan), I'd go with a 180gal for the extra swimming length. JMO
__________________
Troy

lusus naturae
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-31-2002, 11:44 PM
Acro Acro is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Abbotsford
Posts: 495
Acro is on a distinguished road
Default

Troy= smart a$$

So anyways, how much would they have needed to add to make your 155.90909090909gal a 156 gal?
__________________
Jamie Cross
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-31-2002, 11:58 PM
Troy F's Avatar
Troy F Troy F is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Surrey, B.C.
Posts: 1,158
Troy F is on a distinguished road
Default

Ha I dunno, your the math expert :P
__________________
Troy

lusus naturae
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-01-2002, 12:10 AM
Troy F's Avatar
Troy F Troy F is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Surrey, B.C.
Posts: 1,158
Troy F is on a distinguished road
Default

Actually, if they'd made it .03499 inches longer I'd have myself a 156gal tank

Cheap bastards!

PS: that would actually give me a 156.0000118939393939393939gal tank and I don't think I could afford the extra money on water changes, never mind the eye dropper.
__________________
Troy

lusus naturae
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-01-2002, 12:18 AM
Acro Acro is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Abbotsford
Posts: 495
Acro is on a distinguished road
Default

Jamie passes the math expert torch to Troy. I'm geussing you'd start you speach something like this...

I couldn't have done it with out my...Caculator..... 8)
__________________
Jamie Cross
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.