![]() |
|
View Poll Results: If skimmers didn't exist, which would be your next choice? | |||
Wet/Dry (trickle) filter |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
12 | 8.51% |
Fluidized bed filter |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 3.55% |
UV sterilizer |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
9 | 6.38% |
Mechanical filter |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 7.09% |
Live rock/sand bed (exclusively) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
75 | 53.19% |
Carbon filter |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
14 | 9.93% |
Other |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
16 | 11.35% |
Voters: 141. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I assumed that skimming would be the first choice of most people. Please explain your preferred method, and if skimming isn't your first choice, why.
__________________
90gal Starfire mixed reef, 400W MH (Giesemann 13K megachrome/Icecap E-ballast), (2) 54W T5 Giesemann true actinic, 45gal sump (65W 50/50 PC), ASM G-3 Skimmer, Mak 4 return, Sequence Dart closed loop, foam backdrop, 120 lbs LR, 2" sandbed, & 1 dillhole running the show. Last edited by richtg; 02-21-2006 at 05:53 AM. |