Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > Vendor Forums > Oceanic Corals > Everything Pellets

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #131  
Old 05-07-2010, 08:00 PM
Zoaelite's Avatar
Zoaelite Zoaelite is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,461
Zoaelite is on a distinguished road
Default

Having a large varied biomass of bacteria maximizes the types and amounts of nutrients exported out of your system. A single type of bacteria is suited for what it requires while many different species cover the whole spectrum.

That being said, very little is known on the relationship between Bacteria and their surroundings, this is something that is currently being studied. Most of the bacteria supplements we add to our tank are nitrobacter or Nitrosomonas but here is a statement from Ency. Britannica to give you a little info.

Quote:
any of a small group of aerobic bacteria (family Nitrobacteraceae) that use inorganic chemicals as an energy source. They are microorganisms that are important in the nitrogen cycle as converters of soil ammonia to nitrates, compounds usable by plants. The nitrification process requires the mediation of two distinct groups: bacteria that convert ammonia to nitrites (Nitrosomonas, Nitrosospira, Nitrosococcus, and Nitrosolobus) and bacteria that convert nitrites (toxic to plants) to nitrates (Nitrobacter, Nitrospina, and Nitrococcus).

Last edited by Zoaelite; 05-07-2010 at 08:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #132  
Old 05-07-2010, 09:04 PM
Werbo Werbo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 436
Werbo is on a distinguished road
Default

N/P pellets are part of the evolution of carbon dosing and the first "solid" vodka method. Carbon dosing in some form is key to Zeovit and other UNLS systems. Vodka was a cheaper alternative. Early criticisms of dosing vodka alone was that it would produce a monoculture of bacteria in your aquarium and limit the diversity of good bacteria. Vodka is not the only carbon source. A variation that incorporate vodka-sugar-vinegar and incoorporated biodigest became quite popular as theory of the VSV method was to avoid a monoculture. Here is a good read.

http://glassbox-design.com/2008/achi...perimentation/

As far as I know the make-up of N/P pellets is still unknown so some critics fear it will create a monoculture of bacteria, especially after longterm use.

Last edited by Werbo; 05-07-2010 at 09:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #133  
Old 05-07-2010, 09:49 PM
DiverDude's Avatar
DiverDude DiverDude is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 519
DiverDude is on a distinguished road
Default

So in a nutshell, a little bit of a lot of different types of bacteria is what we want. A lot of a single strain is not (probably runs amok !).

I hope to have pellets online tonight so we'll see how it goes.
__________________
-Mark

29 Gal Bowfront w/24" LED Lights. DIY HOB Sump (5.4 Gal) MP40. Orange Spotted Watchman Goby, 2 Clownfish and a few hermits.
Reply With Quote
  #134  
Old 05-07-2010, 10:03 PM
Werbo Werbo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 436
Werbo is on a distinguished road
Default

If it was me I'd start dosing a bacteria source first for 2-4 weeks before starting the pellets in a fluidized reactor. I use Brightwells Microbacter 7 (its cheapest) but Prodibio biodigest or whatever Zeo calls their bacteria culture. Build a diverse bacteria population first and then begin exporting it via carbon dosing/protein skimming.
Reply With Quote
  #135  
Old 05-07-2010, 11:08 PM
DiverDude's Avatar
DiverDude DiverDude is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 519
DiverDude is on a distinguished road
Default

Interesting thought. I was planning on running about 1/10 of a bag (so ~100ml) of pellets to start. After a few weeks, I was going to double it and run with a total of 200-250 ml.

The thought was to not shock the system too much. On top of that, I've just torn the tank apart to add the sump and re-aquascape so it's almost 100% new water and freshly cleaned sand so I'm a little low on bacteria right now.

Maybe I need to rethink this.
__________________
-Mark

29 Gal Bowfront w/24" LED Lights. DIY HOB Sump (5.4 Gal) MP40. Orange Spotted Watchman Goby, 2 Clownfish and a few hermits.
Reply With Quote
  #136  
Old 05-08-2010, 05:33 PM
loveless loveless is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 136
loveless is on a distinguished road
Default

Well I have egg on my face. I took a water sample into a LFS yesterday and guess what. Thats right no Nitrates and no Phos either. Looks like that new test kit I bought was faulty as well as my old one. Now off to buy a new test kit. Hopefully its my tests that are bad and not the LFS'.

Cam
Reply With Quote
  #137  
Old 05-09-2010, 01:53 AM
ILIKECOUGARS's Avatar
ILIKECOUGARS ILIKECOUGARS is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Edmonton,AB.
Posts: 182
ILIKECOUGARS is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by loveless View Post
Well I have egg on my face. I took a water sample into a LFS yesterday and guess what. Thats right no Nitrates and no Phos either. Looks like that new test kit I bought was faulty as well as my old one. Now off to buy a new test kit. Hopefully its my tests that are bad and not the LFS'.

Cam
Which test kit were you useing, and kind was the LFS useing? the reason I am asking, is that I am having about the same reading as you were for nitrate. I am running 1L np pellets with a tlf 550 for over 11 weeks, I am useing a Salifert test kit.
Reply With Quote
  #138  
Old 05-09-2010, 05:03 PM
loveless loveless is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 136
loveless is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ILIKECOUGARS View Post
Which test kit were you useing, and kind was the LFS useing? the reason I am asking, is that I am having about the same reading as you were for nitrate. I am running 1L np pellets with a tlf 550 for over 11 weeks, I am useing a Salifert test kit.
I was originally using Salifert as well which was an old test kit. then I bought a Red Sea test kit. Both showed fairly close to the same readings. I think that the lfs was using a hagen? not entirely too sure.
Reply With Quote
  #139  
Old 05-09-2010, 05:06 PM
lastlight's Avatar
lastlight lastlight is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 6,997
lastlight has a spectacular aura aboutlastlight has a spectacular aura aboutlastlight has a spectacular aura about
Default

If you don't have a very high powered skimmer (Tunze Nano) will the pellets have any negative effects? Doesn't this mulm need to be skimmed out quickly?
__________________
Brett
My 67 392 225 101 94 34 97 404 28 93 209 gallon reef.
Reply With Quote
  #140  
Old 05-09-2010, 05:33 PM
loveless loveless is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 136
loveless is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lastlight View Post
If you don't have a very high powered skimmer (Tunze Nano) will the pellets have any negative effects? Doesn't this mulm need to be skimmed out quickly?
I have noticed my PH being lower as of late and assume its either low oxygen levels or my probe needs calibration. I think what they say is its best to get the majority of the "mulm" out to raise the level of dissolved oxygen as the bacteria on in the mulm is using it up which is why u are supposed to put the out put of your reactor in front of the skimmer. Also a better skimmer will oxygenate the water more effectively.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.